Outbreak of cholera in the East Akim Municipality of Ghana following unhygienic practices by small-scale gold miners, November 2010.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
In October 2010 an outbreak of cholera began among a group of small-scale gold miners in the East-Akim Municipality (EAM), Eastern Region. We investigated to verify the diagnosis, identify risk factors and recommend control measures.
METHODS
We conducted a descriptive investigation, active case-search and an unmatched case-control study. A cholera case-patient was a person with acute watery diarrhoea, with or without vomiting in EAM from 1st October to 20(th) November, 2010. Stool from case-patients and water samples were taken for laboratory diagnosis. We performed univariate and bivariate analysis using epi-info version 3.3.
RESULTS
Of 136 case-patients, 77 (56.6%) were males, of which 40% were miners or from miners households. Index case, a 20 yr-old male miner from Apapam village reported on October 13(th), and case-patients peaked (18.4%) 20 days later. Attack rate was 2/1000 population with no fatality. Ages ranged from 1-84 years; mean of 34±18 yrs. Age-group 20-29 yrs was mostly affected (30.1%) with Apapam village having most case-patients (19.9%). Vibrio cholera serotype ogawa was isolated from stool samples. The main water source, Birim river was polluted by small-scale miners through defecation, post-defecation baths and sand-washings. Compared to controls, case-patients were more likely to have drunk from Birim-River [OR= 6.99, 95% CI: 2.75-18].
CONCLUSION
Vibrio cholera serotype ogawa caused the EAM cholera-outbreak affecting many young adult-males. Drinking water from contaminated community-wide -River was the major risk factors. Boiling or chlorination of water was initiated based on our recommendations and this controlled the outbreak.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.