MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/17457300.2020.1810072

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of injury control and safety promotion · 2020

Is the front passenger seat always the "death seat"? An application of a hierarchical ordered probit model for occupant injury severity.

Zhai Guocong, Yang Hongtai, Liu Jun

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Although many studies have investigated the correlations between injury severities and seat positions, few researchers explored the correlates of injury severities (e.g., seat positions) within a crash that results in multiple occupant injuries. Therefore, we examine the injury correlates within and between crashes, and study the correlations between seat positions and occupant injury severity by constructing a hierarchical ordered probit model. A total of 20,327 occupant injuries in 16,405 motor vehicle crashes in South Australia (2012 - 2016) are used. The results of this study indicate that the rear left passenger seat is associated with a 7.66% higher chance of getting injured (including moderate and severe injury), and the front left passenger seat is associated with a 2.94% higher chance of getting injured compared with the driver seat. Besides, the higher injury chances for other passenger seats including the rear right and rear middle seats are 4.97% and 4.74%, respectively, compared with the driver seat. Thus, this study offers passengers insightful suggestions about how to protect themselves by choosing the right passenger seat in a vehicle.

Для цитирования: Zhai Guocong, Yang Hongtai, Liu Jun. Is the front passenger seat always the "death seat"? An application of a hierarchical ordered probit model for occupant injury severity.. International journal of injury control and safety promotion. 2020. DOI: 10.1080/17457300.2020.1810072.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.