The Journal of trauma · 2010
Association between the initial anatomical severity and opportunity of return to work in occupational hand injured patients.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee Yung-Yi, Chang Jer-Hao, Shieh Shyh-Jou, Lee Yao-Chou, Kuo Li-Chieh, Lee Yungling L
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The severity of the injury is the most important factor to return to work (RTW) when it comes to hand injuries. The purpose of our study is to examine the relationship between the initial anatomic severity, evaluated by the Hand Injury Severity Scoring (HISS) system, and probability of RTW in occupational hand injured patients.
METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, 140 patients hospitalized for surgery due to occupational hand injuries between 2004 and 2008 were recruited. Participants were interviewed for occupational history and RTW status. The probability of RTW was compared with the initial HISS scores by multiple logistic regression models.
RESULTS: In workers' compensation group, there was a significant relationship between HISS severity and the probability of RTW. Compensated patients with moderate injuries (odds ratio [OR] = 0.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03-0.70) and severe injuries (OR = 0.13; 95% CI, 0.02-0.75) were significantly less likely to RTW than those with minor injuries, and those with major injuries were the least likely to RTW (OR = 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01-0.36). However, no association was found between HISS severity and the probability of RTW for patients without workers' compensation. With regard to the HISS components, patients with motor or neural component deficits had a significantly lower opportunity of RTW, with the neural deficits being the most influential.
CONCLUSION: HISS is a useful instrument to predict the opportunity of RTW while restricted to the compensated patients. We also verified that the relationship between HISS severity and the probability of RTW existed for groups but not for individual patients.
METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, 140 patients hospitalized for surgery due to occupational hand injuries between 2004 and 2008 were recruited. Participants were interviewed for occupational history and RTW status. The probability of RTW was compared with the initial HISS scores by multiple logistic regression models.
RESULTS: In workers' compensation group, there was a significant relationship between HISS severity and the probability of RTW. Compensated patients with moderate injuries (odds ratio [OR] = 0.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03-0.70) and severe injuries (OR = 0.13; 95% CI, 0.02-0.75) were significantly less likely to RTW than those with minor injuries, and those with major injuries were the least likely to RTW (OR = 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01-0.36). However, no association was found between HISS severity and the probability of RTW for patients without workers' compensation. With regard to the HISS components, patients with motor or neural component deficits had a significantly lower opportunity of RTW, with the neural deficits being the most influential.
CONCLUSION: HISS is a useful instrument to predict the opportunity of RTW while restricted to the compensated patients. We also verified that the relationship between HISS severity and the probability of RTW existed for groups but not for individual patients.