DOI 10.1007/s00701-022-05253-3
Variations of perforating arteries of anterior communicating artery in cases with anterior communicating artery aneurysms: a cadaveric anatomical study.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: In terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality, preservation of the perforating arteries branching from the anterior communicating artery (ACoA) during clipping is particularly imperative in patients with ACoA aneurysm. In the present study, we aimed to investigate whether perforating arteries originated from ACoA were pushed away in a different location in patients with ACoA aneurysm. Furthermore, if they did so, we aimed to identify the direction in which they were dislocated and how the perforating arteries could be preserved during clipping.
METHODS
Herein, we categorized 40 brains obtained from cadavers into two groups. The first (n = 26) and second (n = 14) groups included cases without and with ACoA aneurysms, respectively. After completing the preparation procedure, the brains were dissected using surgical microscope and the relevant anatomical region was examined and photographed. Finally, statistical analyses were performed on the data and the results were documented.
RESULTS
In the aneurysms with posterior and superior projections, the perforators appeared to be pushed away inferiorly and were frequently noted at the anteroinferior part of the aneurysm neck. Most of the cases, where one of the A1s was larger at one side, the perforating arteries arose from the larger A1 side.
CONCLUSION
The mortality and morbidity associated with damage to the perforators can be reduced by approaching the patient from the dominant A1 side and pursuing the perforators primarily at the anteroinferior part of the aneurysm neck in the aneurysms with superior and posterior projections.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.