Journal of neurology · 2019
Optimizing 3D FLAIR to detect MS lesions: pushing past factory settings for precise results.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lecler Augustin, Bouzad C, Deschamps R, Maizeroi F, Sadik J C, Gueguen A, Gout O, Picard H, Savatovsky J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: To assess the diagnostic value of three 3D FLAIR sequences with differing repetition-times (TR) at 3-Tesla when detecting multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions.
METHODS: In this prospective study, approved by the institutional review board, 27 patients with confirmed MS were prospectively included. One radiologist performed manual segmentations of all high-signal intensity lesions using three 3D FLAIR data sets with different TR of 4800 ms ("FLAIR4800"), 8000 ms ("FLAIR8000") and 10,000 ms ("FLAIR10,000") and two radiologists double-checked it. The main judgment criterion was the overall number of lesions; secondary objectives were the assessment of lesion location, as well as measuring contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). A non-parametric Wilcoxon's test was used to compare the differing FLAIR.
RESULTS: The FLAIR8000 and FLAIR10,000 detected significantly more overall lesions per patient as compared with the FLAIR4800 [116.1 (± 61.7) (p = 0.02) and 115.8 (± 56.3) (p = 0.03) versus 99.2 (± 66.9), respectively]. The FLAIR8000 and FLAIR10,000 detected four and eight times more cortical or juxta-cortical lesions per patient as compared with FLAIR4800 [1.6 (± 2.2) (p = 0.001) and 4.1 (± 5.9) (p = 6 × 10-5) versus 0.4 (± 1.1), respectively]. CNR was significantly correlated to the TR value. It was significantly higher with FLAIR10,000 than it was with FLAIR8000 and FLAIR4800 [16.3 (± 3.5) versus 15 (± 2.4) (p = 0.01) and 12 (± 2.2) (p = 2 × 10-6), respectively] CONCLUSION: An optimized 3D FLAIR with a long TR significantly improved both overall lesion detection and CNR in MS patients as compared to a 3D FLAIR with factory settings.
METHODS: In this prospective study, approved by the institutional review board, 27 patients with confirmed MS were prospectively included. One radiologist performed manual segmentations of all high-signal intensity lesions using three 3D FLAIR data sets with different TR of 4800 ms ("FLAIR4800"), 8000 ms ("FLAIR8000") and 10,000 ms ("FLAIR10,000") and two radiologists double-checked it. The main judgment criterion was the overall number of lesions; secondary objectives were the assessment of lesion location, as well as measuring contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). A non-parametric Wilcoxon's test was used to compare the differing FLAIR.
RESULTS: The FLAIR8000 and FLAIR10,000 detected significantly more overall lesions per patient as compared with the FLAIR4800 [116.1 (± 61.7) (p = 0.02) and 115.8 (± 56.3) (p = 0.03) versus 99.2 (± 66.9), respectively]. The FLAIR8000 and FLAIR10,000 detected four and eight times more cortical or juxta-cortical lesions per patient as compared with FLAIR4800 [1.6 (± 2.2) (p = 0.001) and 4.1 (± 5.9) (p = 6 × 10-5) versus 0.4 (± 1.1), respectively]. CNR was significantly correlated to the TR value. It was significantly higher with FLAIR10,000 than it was with FLAIR8000 and FLAIR4800 [16.3 (± 3.5) versus 15 (± 2.4) (p = 0.01) and 12 (± 2.2) (p = 2 × 10-6), respectively] CONCLUSION: An optimized 3D FLAIR with a long TR significantly improved both overall lesion detection and CNR in MS patients as compared to a 3D FLAIR with factory settings.