Australian occupational therapy journal · 2026
Measurement properties of the Spanish version of the Engagement in Meaningful Activities Survey in parents of children with developmental challenges.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Noce Paula, Muñoz-Sánchez Rocío, Juárez-Leal Iris, Piñero-Peñalver Jessica, Siendones-Molina Mónica, Hurtado-Pomares Miriam, Navarrete-Muñoz Eva-María, Valera-Gran Desirée
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Parents of children with developmental challenges often face constraints that reduce engagement in meaningful activities (MAs). This study evaluated the measurement properties of the Spanish version of the Engagement in Meaningful Activities Survey (EMAS) in this population.
METHODS: A convenience sample of 688 Spanish parents (468 mothers and 220 fathers) of children with developmental challenges completed the Spanish EMAS, the Occupational Balance Questionnaire (OBQ), the Parental Stress Scale (PSS; Baby's Rewards [PSS-BR] and Stressors [PSS-S]), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A and HADS-D), and the Psychological Well-Being Scale (PWBS). Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, structural validity, and construct validity were examined.
CONSUMER AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT: There was no consumer or community involvement in this study.
RESULTS: EMAS scores averaged 31.1 (standard deviation [SD] = 7.1) for mothers and 33.4 (SD = 6.4) for fathers, with no floor or ceiling effects. Internal consistency was high (α = 0.88 for mothers; α = 0.86 for fathers). Test-retest reliability in mothers (n = 75) was moderate (intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42, 0.72; rs = 0.62). A two-factor structure showed acceptable fit. Construct validity was supported through correlations with OBQ (rsm [mothers] = 0.61; rsf [fathers] = 0.63), HADS-A (rsm = -0.41; rsf = -0.36), HADS-D (rsm = -0.50; rsf = -0.47), PSS-BR (rsm = 0.37; rsf = 0.31), PSS-S (rsm = -0.25; rsf = -0.26), and PWBS (rsm = 0.46; rsf = 0.52).
CONCLUSION: The Spanish EMAS shows robust measurement properties for assessing engagement in MAs among parents of children with developmental challenges. Its use may support family-centred interventions and research.
METHODS: A convenience sample of 688 Spanish parents (468 mothers and 220 fathers) of children with developmental challenges completed the Spanish EMAS, the Occupational Balance Questionnaire (OBQ), the Parental Stress Scale (PSS; Baby's Rewards [PSS-BR] and Stressors [PSS-S]), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A and HADS-D), and the Psychological Well-Being Scale (PWBS). Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, structural validity, and construct validity were examined.
CONSUMER AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT: There was no consumer or community involvement in this study.
RESULTS: EMAS scores averaged 31.1 (standard deviation [SD] = 7.1) for mothers and 33.4 (SD = 6.4) for fathers, with no floor or ceiling effects. Internal consistency was high (α = 0.88 for mothers; α = 0.86 for fathers). Test-retest reliability in mothers (n = 75) was moderate (intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42, 0.72; rs = 0.62). A two-factor structure showed acceptable fit. Construct validity was supported through correlations with OBQ (rsm [mothers] = 0.61; rsf [fathers] = 0.63), HADS-A (rsm = -0.41; rsf = -0.36), HADS-D (rsm = -0.50; rsf = -0.47), PSS-BR (rsm = 0.37; rsf = 0.31), PSS-S (rsm = -0.25; rsf = -0.26), and PWBS (rsm = 0.46; rsf = 0.52).
CONCLUSION: The Spanish EMAS shows robust measurement properties for assessing engagement in MAs among parents of children with developmental challenges. Its use may support family-centred interventions and research.