Sleep health · 2026
Sleep security: A rights-based approach.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schokman Aaron, Edmed Shannon L, Cobb-Clark Deborah, Tymula Agnieszka, Rossa Kalina R, Pattinson Cassandra L, Glozier Nick, Smith Simon S
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Sleep is a fundamental biological process, yet environmental and social factors can influence sleep health. This study aimed to advance a human rights perspective on sleep by developing the emerging concept of sleep security.
METHODS: An in-person workshop and online modified Delphi study were conducted (2024-2025) to refine/revise the definition and primary domains of sleep security. Participants were primarily Australian experts with clinical or academic experience in sleep, social determinants of health, health equity, and/or environmental health. Participants rated level of agreement with proposed definitions and domains of sleep security and provided qualitative feedback to justify their choices. Iterative rounds evaluated refined definitions if (a) <75% of participants indicated they "agree" or "strongly agree" and/or (b) content analysis of qualitative data indicated conceptual ambiguity or inconsistent interpretation.
RESULTS: Thirty-one experts participated in Round 1, and 19 in Round 2. Although the overarching definition of sleep security and 4 of its proposed 5 domains reached the a priori agreement threshold in the first round, content analysis of qualitative feedback led to an alternative definition of sleep security and revised descriptions for 2 domains in Round 2. An overall definition of sleep security and its 5 primary domains (Safety and security, conducive environment, policy and practice, opportunities and demands, and autonomy) was agreed upon.
CONCLUSIONS: A preliminary conceptualization of sleep security provides a framework for guiding research and advocacy efforts to improve social, environmental, and structural conditions that support sleep health. Further work is needed to test and refine this framework globally.
METHODS: An in-person workshop and online modified Delphi study were conducted (2024-2025) to refine/revise the definition and primary domains of sleep security. Participants were primarily Australian experts with clinical or academic experience in sleep, social determinants of health, health equity, and/or environmental health. Participants rated level of agreement with proposed definitions and domains of sleep security and provided qualitative feedback to justify their choices. Iterative rounds evaluated refined definitions if (a) <75% of participants indicated they "agree" or "strongly agree" and/or (b) content analysis of qualitative data indicated conceptual ambiguity or inconsistent interpretation.
RESULTS: Thirty-one experts participated in Round 1, and 19 in Round 2. Although the overarching definition of sleep security and 4 of its proposed 5 domains reached the a priori agreement threshold in the first round, content analysis of qualitative feedback led to an alternative definition of sleep security and revised descriptions for 2 domains in Round 2. An overall definition of sleep security and its 5 primary domains (Safety and security, conducive environment, policy and practice, opportunities and demands, and autonomy) was agreed upon.
CONCLUSIONS: A preliminary conceptualization of sleep security provides a framework for guiding research and advocacy efforts to improve social, environmental, and structural conditions that support sleep health. Further work is needed to test and refine this framework globally.