European journal of neurology · 2023
Comparison of acute flaccid myelitis and transverse myelitis in children and evaluation of diagnostic criteria.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Helfferich Jelte, Bruijstens Arlette L, Knoester Marjolein, Brouwer Oebele F, Neuteboom Rinze F, 2016 Enterovirus D68 Acute Flaccid Myelitis Working Group and the Dutch Study Group for Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis and Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Acute flaccid myelitis (AFM) and transverse myelitis (TM) are serious conditions that may be difficult to differentiate, especially at onset of disease. In this study, we compared clinical features of pediatric AFM and TM and evaluated current diagnostic criteria, aiming to improve early and accurate diagnosis.
METHODS: Two cohorts of children with enterovirus D68-associated AFM and clinically diagnosed TM were compared regarding presenting clinical features, additional investigations, and outcome. Current diagnostic criteria for AFM and TM were applied to evaluate their specificity.
RESULTS: Children with AFM (n = 21) compared to those with TM (n = 36) were younger (median 3 vs. 10 years), more often had a prodromal illness (100% vs. 39%), predominant proximal weakness (69% vs. 17%), and hyporeflexia (100% vs. 44%), and less often had sensory deficits (0% vs. 81%), bowel and/or bladder dysfunction (12% vs. 69%), and hyperreflexia (0% vs. 44%). On magnetic resonance imaging, brainstem involvement was more common in AFM (74% vs. 21%), whereas supratentorial abnormalities were only seen in TM (0% vs. 40%). When omitting the criterion of a sensory level, 11 of 15 (73%) children with AFM fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for TM. Of children with TM, four of 33 (12%) fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for probable/definite AFM.
CONCLUSIONS: Although there is considerable overlap between AFM and TM in children, we found important early differentiating clinical and diagnostic features. Meeting diagnostic criteria for AFM in children with TM and vice versa underlines the importance of thorough clinical examination and early and accurate diagnostic studies.
METHODS: Two cohorts of children with enterovirus D68-associated AFM and clinically diagnosed TM were compared regarding presenting clinical features, additional investigations, and outcome. Current diagnostic criteria for AFM and TM were applied to evaluate their specificity.
RESULTS: Children with AFM (n = 21) compared to those with TM (n = 36) were younger (median 3 vs. 10 years), more often had a prodromal illness (100% vs. 39%), predominant proximal weakness (69% vs. 17%), and hyporeflexia (100% vs. 44%), and less often had sensory deficits (0% vs. 81%), bowel and/or bladder dysfunction (12% vs. 69%), and hyperreflexia (0% vs. 44%). On magnetic resonance imaging, brainstem involvement was more common in AFM (74% vs. 21%), whereas supratentorial abnormalities were only seen in TM (0% vs. 40%). When omitting the criterion of a sensory level, 11 of 15 (73%) children with AFM fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for TM. Of children with TM, four of 33 (12%) fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for probable/definite AFM.
CONCLUSIONS: Although there is considerable overlap between AFM and TM in children, we found important early differentiating clinical and diagnostic features. Meeting diagnostic criteria for AFM in children with TM and vice versa underlines the importance of thorough clinical examination and early and accurate diagnostic studies.