International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology · 1997
Decreasing morbidity following laryngotracheal reconstruction in children.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yellon R F, Parameswaran M, Brandom B W
Аннотация
Our objectives are to report (1) methods for decreasing infectious complications and excessive weakness associated with the period of sedation and neuromuscular blockade (NMB) following single-stage laryngotracheal reconstruction (SSLTR); (2) an association between gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and subglottic stenosis (SGS); (3) results of 21 SSLTRs and 15 two-stage LTRs (TSLTRs). A retrospective chart review was performed for the period January, 1990-August, 1995, including 36 patients who had 38 LTRs for SGS and/or posterior glottic stenosis at a tertiary care center. Our most recent post-SSLTR protocol included: (1) prophylactic antimicrobials (clindamycin plus antipseudomonal agents = C + A); (2) GER treatment; (3) titrated infusion NMB with daily recovery of neuromuscular function; (4) avoidance of prolonged simultaneous administration of NMB and corticosteroids. Patients who had prophylactic antimicrobials (C + A) during intubation following SSLTR had fewer (1/13, 8%) postoperative infectious complications than patients who received other/no antibiotics (4/8, 50%) (P < 0.05). Avoidance of prolonged simultaneous administration of NMB and corticosteroids and use of titrated infusion of NMB with daily recovery of neuromuscular function was associated with less weakness following extubation (0/11, 0% vs. 4/6, 66%) (P < 0.002). Of 26 patients tested for GER, 21 (81%) had at least one positive test, suggesting a significant association between GER and SGS (P < 0.05). The overall success rate for LTR was 33/36 or 92%. SSLTR had a 95% success rate while two-stage LTR had an 87% success rate, although two revisions were required. Prophylactic antimicrobials, improved postoperative management and GER treatment allowed successful LTRs with decreased infectious complications and less weakness.