MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1001/archpedi.1993.02160330035013

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of diseases of children (1960) · 1993

The value of early treatment of deer tick bites for the prevention of Lyme disease.

Agre F, Schwartz R

Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To determine if the early antibiotic treatment of deer tick bites prevented Lyme disease.

DESIGN

Prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, antibiotic treatment.

SETTING

Private practice in an area endemic for Lyme disease.

STUDY

PARTICIPANTS

Patients between 3 and 19 years of age who received antibiotic treatment within 3 days following a deer tick bite.

INTERVENTIONS: Patients received an antibiotic or placebo and were followed up for stage I and II disease. All patients had blood drawn at the time of presentation and 6 weeks later for immunofluorescent antibodies (IFA).

MEASUREMENTS/MAIN

RESULTS

One patient in the placebo group developed clinical Lyme disease associated with an IFA titer of 1:32, considered weakly positive. Three other patients in the placebo group developed an IFA titer of 1:32; one had an influenzalike illness and two had no symptoms. None of the study patients developed any neurologic, cardiac, or arthritic symptoms in the 1- to 3-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Based on the low frequency of illness, the absence of stage II disease, and the inability to establish the efficacy of early antibiotic treatment, we suggest that physicians not routinely use prophylactic antibiotics for deer tick bites.

Для цитирования: Agre F, Schwartz R. The value of early treatment of deer tick bites for the prevention of Lyme disease.. American journal of diseases of children (1960). 1993. DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.1993.02160330035013.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.