Journal of the National Medical Association · 2025
The association of patient and clinician demographics and concordance with medicaid sterilization consent form validity.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jackson-Moore Lisa, Malloy Kim, Urrutia Gene, Berg Kristen A, Miller Emily S, Boozer Margaret, Serna Tania, Bailit Jennifer L, Larkin Suzanna, Arora Kavita Shah
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE(S): To evaluate the association between patient demographics, clinician demographics, and concordance of patient-clinician demographics and Medicaid sterilization consent form validity, defined as the waiting period having elapsed.
STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a large, multi-center retrospective cohort study. This analysis included patients with Medicaid insurance desiring postpartum permanent contraception across three study sites. Our primary outcome was Medicaid sterilization consent form validity. Patient demographics were abstracted from the electronic medical record. Clinician demographics were obtained both through self- and peer-report. Descriptive, random effects modeling, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were utilized.
RESULTS: Of the 1644 patients delivered by 124 clinicians in our cohort, 840 (51 %) had a valid Medicaid sterilization consent form. Descriptively, patients who were Black, unmarried, and not college educated were more likely to have valid forms (p < 0.001). The religious affiliation of the clinician (p < 0.001), but no other clinician characteristics, was associated with form validity. In multivariable models, patients who were of a different racial identity than their clinicians were more likely to have a valid form (aOR 1.32, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.66).
CONCLUSION(S): While unable to determine the causes of our findings, the differential proportion of Medicaid sterilization consent form validity based on patient characteristics is concerning. Differences in form validity based on patient-clinician racial and ethnic concordance is deserving of further study.
STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a large, multi-center retrospective cohort study. This analysis included patients with Medicaid insurance desiring postpartum permanent contraception across three study sites. Our primary outcome was Medicaid sterilization consent form validity. Patient demographics were abstracted from the electronic medical record. Clinician demographics were obtained both through self- and peer-report. Descriptive, random effects modeling, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were utilized.
RESULTS: Of the 1644 patients delivered by 124 clinicians in our cohort, 840 (51 %) had a valid Medicaid sterilization consent form. Descriptively, patients who were Black, unmarried, and not college educated were more likely to have valid forms (p < 0.001). The religious affiliation of the clinician (p < 0.001), but no other clinician characteristics, was associated with form validity. In multivariable models, patients who were of a different racial identity than their clinicians were more likely to have a valid form (aOR 1.32, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.66).
CONCLUSION(S): While unable to determine the causes of our findings, the differential proportion of Medicaid sterilization consent form validity based on patient characteristics is concerning. Differences in form validity based on patient-clinician racial and ethnic concordance is deserving of further study.