Perceptions and practice of state Medicaid officials regarding informed consent for female sterilization.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the attitudes, beliefs, and interpretations of individual state Medicaid office employees regarding their state's postpartum sterilization policy and its impact on patient care.

STUDY

DESIGN

We invited employees in all 50 state Medicaid director's offices who self- or peer-identified as best informed about the sterilization policy to participate in semi-structured qualitative interviews. Using a pilot-tested interview guide, we transcribed, coded, and analyzed each interview. We attempted to obtain supplemental data, including relevant policy details and instructions for physicians in the state, from all 50 state Medicaid office websites.

RESULTS

We collected data from 15 telephone interviews, four written responses, and 48 states' websites for analysis. Participants had varying responses regarding the impact of the Medicaid-mandated sterilization consent form in terms of informed consent as well as the utility and ramifications of the waiting period. State policies varied in terms of the age of consent, complexity of the form, availability of translations, use of unclear terminology, and the consent-obtaining process.

CONCLUSION

State Medicaid employees have differences in opinions regarding the intent of the Medicaid-mandated sterilization consent form and policies. Better understanding of the variation in individual state policies that may contribute to inequitable access to sterilization is necessary.

IMPLICATIONS: Provision of consistent guidelines and widespread coordination of the Medicaid sterilization policies in identified areas impacting informed consent may reduce existing obstacles and provide more equitable access to contraceptive care.