MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/0886260514555867

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of interpersonal violence · 2014

Determinants of Intimate Partner Violence Among HIV-Positive and HIV-Negative Women in India.

Chakraborty Hrishikesh, Patted Shobhana, Gan Anita, Islam Farahnaz, Revankar Amit

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

To reduce the many adverse health outcomes associated with intimate partner violence (IPV), high-risk groups need to be specifically targeted in the fight against domestic violence in India. This study aims to examine the prevalence and correlates of IPV in HIV-positive and HIV-negative women from India. A convenience sample of HIV-positive and HIV-negative women responded to questionnaires to assess their experience and perception of violence. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to model the association between IPV and age, education, employment status, contraception use, age at first marriage, and HIV status. Although adjusting for age, education, employment status, contraception use, age at first marriage, and HIV status, women who are employed were 3.5 times more likely to suffer IPV (confidence interval [CI] = [1.5, 8.5]), women aged 18 or above at first marriage are 0.3 times less likely to face IPV (CI = [0.1, 0.6]), and women who use contraception are 7 times more likely to suffer IPV (CI = [1.4, 30.2]). Also, HIV-positive women are 3 times more likely to face sexual violence compared with HIV-negative women (CI = [1.1, 7.6]).

Для цитирования: Chakraborty Hrishikesh, Patted Shobhana, Gan Anita, Islam Farahnaz, Revankar Amit. Determinants of Intimate Partner Violence Among HIV-Positive and HIV-Negative Women in India.. Journal of interpersonal violence. 2014. DOI: 10.1177/0886260514555867.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.