MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.08.016

Медицинская библиотека · Contraception · 2017

Comparing long-acting reversible contraception insertion rates in women with Medicaid vs. private insurance in a clinic with a two-visit protocol.

Higgins Tara M, Dougherty Anne K, Badger Gary J, Heil Sarah H

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

This study examined whether women with Medicaid are less likely to receive long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) in a clinic requiring two visits for insertion.

STUDY

DESIGN

LARC insertion and pregnancy rates were compared among women with Medicaid vs. private insurance, along with other predictors, in a retrospective chart review (N=447).

RESULTS

Univariately, fewer women with Medicaid vs. private insurance received LARC (66% vs. 79%, p<.01) and more become pregnant (18% vs. 6%, p<.001). Significant multivariate predictors of not receiving LARC were being unmarried and postpartum, both of which were associated with having Medicaid.

CONCLUSION

Women with Medicaid are less likely than women with private insurance to have a requested LARC device inserted when a clinic requires two visits for insertion.

Для цитирования: Higgins Tara M, Dougherty Anne K, Badger Gary J, Heil Sarah H. Comparing long-acting reversible contraception insertion rates in women with Medicaid vs. private insurance in a clinic with a two-visit protocol.. Contraception. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.08.016.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.