First evidence supporting the theory of the sensorimotor paradox on the origins of mind and language.

For now 15 years, I have been developing a hypothesis on the origins of mind and language during our evolution, called theory of the sensorimotor paradox. The core neuroimaging part of the hypothesis is that the switch in our relation to our hands, coming with bipedal stance, would have allowed us to disrupt the function of sensory prediction to resolve into motor action and sensory feedback: we can't take our hand as an object of interaction and have it grasp itself at the same time. This would later on be autonomised as mental representation. From there, non-resolution of prediction into motor action would prevent a system from liberating tension in order to be available again and collect feedback (meta-prediction). Using Schalk, G. et al.'s extensive dataset of EEG recordings on motor movement and imagery (2009), I am now able to support some of the theory's claims. Notably, meta-analysis of movement and imagery recordings tends to stress a higher variability of frequency activation amongst motor signals than imagery's. This would indicate a greater difficulty for a system to release tension in an effort to produce and maintain mental representation. Similar short oscillatory predictive change, but greater uncoupling of frontal and prefrontal regions suggests sensory suppression of efference-copy and greater instability toward the eventuality of collecting feedback when motor action is triggered, relying on somatosensory support. Event-related time-frequency analysis on proprioceptive areas shows delay of neural signal to mental representation compared to motor action, which could be a strong evidence of dissociation.