MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103846

Медицинская библиотека · Applied ergonomics · 2022

Managing multiple perspectives in the collaborative design process of a team health information technology.

Hose Bat-Zion, Carayon Pascale, Hoonakker Peter L T, Ross Joshua C, Eithun Benjamin L, Rusy Deborah A, Kohler Jonathan E, Brazelton Thomas B, Dean Shannon M, Kelly Michelle M

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We need to design technologies that support the work of health care teams; designing such solutions should integrate different clinical roles. However, we know little about the actual collaboration that occurs in the design process for a team-based care solution. This study examines how multiple perspectives were managed in the design of a team health IT solution aimed at supporting clinician information needs during pediatric trauma care transitions. We focused our analysis on four co-design sessions that involved multiple clinicians caring for pediatric trauma patients. We analyzed design session transcripts using content analysis and process coding guided by Détienne's (2006) co-design framework. We expanded upon Détienne (2006) three collaborative activities to identify specific themes and processes of collaboration between care team members engaged in the design process. The themes and processes describe how team members collaborated in a team health IT design process that resulted in a highly usable technology.

Для цитирования: Hose Bat-Zion, Carayon Pascale, Hoonakker Peter L T, Ross Joshua C, Eithun Benjamin L, Rusy Deborah A, Kohler Jonathan E, Brazelton Thomas B, Dean Shannon M, Kelly Michelle M. Managing multiple perspectives in the collaborative design process of a team health information technology.. Applied ergonomics. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103846.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.