MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology · 2011

[Adverse events during transcranial muscle evoked potential monitoring].

Kuwahara Yoshie, Taguchi Shima, Kuroda Masahiko, Kawamoto Masashi

Клинический случайАннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Transcranial muscle evoked potential (TC-MsEP) monitoring is available to assess spinal cord motor tract function for preventing paralysis in spine surgery. Recently, the quality of monitoring has improved. However, adverse events such as torn tracheal tube, bitten tongue, and mandibular fracture are reported.

METHODS

We reviewed retrospectively adverse events with TC-MsEP monitoring by Multipulse D-185 (Digitimer Ltd., the U.K.) during spine surgery in our hospital. In addition, we compared the number of cases with transformed tracheal tubes in cases using Multipulse D-185 and in cases using the other stimulation device.

RESULTS

Since June 2007, Multipulse D-185 is applied as a stimulating device of TC-MsEP, and we experienced two adverse events of lasceration of tongue and teeth dislocation. There was a significant difference (P=0.02) in the number of transformed tracheal tube between Multipulse D-185 (11 of 20) and the other stimulation device (2 of 19).

CONCLUSIONS

It seems that two adverse events were due to excessive masseter muscles contraction with TC-MsEP monitoring. Prevention for bite injury and ventilation strategy for tube occlusion or stenosis using Multipulse D-185 for TC-MsEP are necessary.

Для цитирования: Kuwahara Yoshie, Taguchi Shima, Kuroda Masahiko, Kawamoto Masashi. [Adverse events during transcranial muscle evoked potential monitoring].. Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology. 2011.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.