MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/09273948.2014.1001518

Медицинская библиотека · Ocular immunology and inflammation · 2015

Microbiologic Examination of Bandage Contact Lenses Used after Corneal Collagen Cross-linking Treatment.

Yuksel Erdem, Yalcin Nuriye Gokçen, Kilic Gaye, Cubuk Mehmet Ozgur, Ozmen Mehmet Cuneyt, Altay Aylin, Çağlar Kayhan, Bilgihan Kamil

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To investigate the agents of bacterial contamination of contact lenses after corneal collagen cross-linking (CCL), and to present the possible changes of ocular flora after riboflavin/ultraviolet A.

METHODS

Seventy-two contact lenses of patients who underwent CCL and 41 contact lenses of patients who underwent photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) as control group were enrolled to the study. After 48 h of incubation, broth culture media was transferred to plates. Samples were accepted as positive if one or more colony-forming units were shown.

RESULTS

There were positive cultures in 12 (16.7%) contact lenses in the CCL group and 5 (12.2%) had positive cultures in PRK group. Coagulase-negative staphlycocci (CNS) were the most frequent microorganism. Alpha hemolytic streptococci and Diphteroid spp. were the other isolated microorganisms.

CONCLUSIONS

Bacterial colonization can occur during and early after the CCL procedure in epithelial healing. To prevent corneal infections after the treatment, prophylactic antibiotics should be prescribed.

Для цитирования: Yuksel Erdem, Yalcin Nuriye Gokçen, Kilic Gaye, Cubuk Mehmet Ozgur, Ozmen Mehmet Cuneyt, Altay Aylin, Çağlar Kayhan, Bilgihan Kamil. Microbiologic Examination of Bandage Contact Lenses Used after Corneal Collagen Cross-linking Treatment.. Ocular immunology and inflammation. 2015. DOI: 10.3109/09273948.2014.1001518.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.