MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/pace.13842

Медицинская библиотека · Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE · 2019

Radiation exposure during cardiac device implantation: Lessons learned from a multicenter registry.

Bru Paul, Dompnier Antoine, Amara Walid, Haddad Georges, Galuscan Gianina, Sagnol Pascal, Steinbach Mathieu, Montagnier Christian, Taieb Jérôme, Beguec Julien, Milhem Antoine, CNCH Cardiac Rhythm Group

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Little data are available about radiation exposure during cardiac electrical device implantation, and no dose reference levels have been published. This multicenter, prospective, observational study assesses patient and staff radiation exposure during cardiac device implantations, and aims at defining dose reference levels.

METHODS

Patient demographic, procedural, and radiation data were obtained for 657 procedures from nine institutions. Physician and staff exposure were measured using real-time dosimeters worn beneath and above lead apron. Statistical analysis included fluoroscopy time (FT), dose-area product (DAP), and DAP adjusted for FT and body mass index.

RESULTS

Pacemakers and cardioverter defibrillators were implanted in 481 and 176 patients, respectively. Of these, 152 were treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Median FTs were 837s (interquartile range [IQR]: 480-1323), 117s (IQR: 69-209), and 101s (IQR: 58-162), and median DAPs were 1410 (IQR: 807-2601), 150 (IQR: 72-338), and 129 (IQR: 72-332) cGy.cm² for biventricular, dual chamber, and ventricular device implantation, respectively. Dose reference levels correspond to the third quartile values. During CRT, higher exposure was observed with four X-ray systems than with the two newer and customizable ones (adjusted DAP of 0.90 [IQR: 0.26-1.01] and 0.29 [IQR: 0.23-0.39], respectively; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Based on real-life measurements, this multicenter registry provides dose reference levels and may help centers assess radiation exposure. Although biventricular device implantation was responsible for the highest radiation exposure, FT was meaningfully shortened compared to previously reported values. For a same FT, the use of new generators and custom settings has significantly reduced DAP.

Для цитирования: Bru Paul, Dompnier Antoine, Amara Walid, Haddad Georges, Galuscan Gianina, Sagnol Pascal, Steinbach Mathieu, Montagnier Christian, Taieb Jérôme, Beguec Julien, Milhem Antoine, CNCH Cardiac Rhythm Group. Radiation exposure during cardiac device implantation: Lessons learned from a multicenter registry.. Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE. 2019. DOI: 10.1111/pace.13842.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.