MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/pcc.0000000000002123

Медицинская библиотека · Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2019

Apneic Oxygenation As a Quality Improvement Intervention in an Academic PICU.

Napolitano Natalie, Laverriere Elizabeth K, Craig Nancy, Snyder Megan, Thompson Allison, Davis Daniela, Nett Sholeen, Branca Aline, Harwayne-Gidansky Ilana, Sanders Ron, Shults Justine, Nadkarni Vinay, Nishisaki Akira, National Emergency Airway Registry for Children (NEAR4KIDS) and Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI)

СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate if the use of apneic oxygenation during tracheal intubation in children is feasible and would decrease the occurrence of oxygen desaturation.

DESIGN

Prospective pre/post observational study.

SETTING

A large single-center noncardiac PICU in North America.

PATIENTS: All patients less than 18 years old who underwent primary tracheal intubation from August 1, 2014, to September 30, 2018.

INTERVENTIONS: Implementation of apneic oxygenation for all primary tracheal intubation as quality improvement.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS

Total of 1,373 tracheal intubations (661 preimplementation and 712 postimplementation) took place during study period. Within 2 months, apneic oxygenation use reached to predefined adherence threshold (> 80% of primary tracheal intubations) after implementation and sustained at greater than 70% level throughout the postimplementation. Between the preimplementation and postimplementation, no significant differences were observed in patient demographics, difficult airway features, or providers. Respiratory and procedural indications were more common during preintervention. Video laryngoscopy devices were used more often during the postimplementation (pre 5% vs post 75%; p < 0.001). Moderate oxygen desaturation less than 80% were observed in fewer tracheal intubations after apneic oxygenation implementation (pre 15.4% vs post 11.8%; p = 0.049); severe oxygen desaturation less than 70% was also observed in fewer tracheal intubations after implementation (pre 10.4% vs post 7.2%; p = 0.032). Hemodynamic tracheal intubation associated events (i.e., cardiac arrests, hypotension, dysrhythmia) were unchanged (pre 3.2% vs post 2.0%; p = 0.155). Multivariable analyses showed apneic oxygenation implementation was significantly associated with a decrease in moderate desaturation less than 80% (adjusted odds ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.34-0.88) and with severe desaturation less than 70% (adjusted odds ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.31-0.96) while adjusting for tracheal intubation indications and device.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of apneic oxygenation in PICU was feasible, and was associated with significant reduction in moderate and severe oxygen desaturation. Use of apneic oxygenation should be considered when intubating critically ill children.

Для цитирования: Napolitano Natalie, Laverriere Elizabeth K, Craig Nancy, Snyder Megan, Thompson Allison, Davis Daniela, Nett Sholeen, Branca Aline, Harwayne-Gidansky Ilana, Sanders Ron, Shults Justine, Nadkarni Vinay, Nishisaki Akira, National Emergency Airway Registry for Children (NEAR4KIDS) and Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI). Apneic Oxygenation As a Quality Improvement Intervention in an Academic PICU.. Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies. 2019. DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000002123.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.