JACC. Cardiovascular interventions · 2016
Chronic Kidney Disease in the Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Era: Pooled Analysis of the Korean Multicenter Drug-Eluting Stent Registry.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee Joo Myung, Kang Jeehoon, Lee Euijae, Hwang Doyeon, Rhee Tae-Min, Park Jonghanne, Kim Hack-Lyoung, Lee Sang Eun, Han Jung-Kyu, Yang Han-Mo, Park Kyung Woo, Na Sang-Hoon, Kang Hyun-Jae, Koo Bon-Kwon, Kim Hyo-Soo
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on clinical outcomes in contemporary practice of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES).
BACKGROUND: Although second-generation DES have improved the safety and efficacy issues in PCI, data regarding the performance of second-generation DES in patients with CKD are still limited.
METHODS: We performed a patient-level pooled analysis on 12,426 patients undergoing PCI using second-generation DES from the Korean Multicenter Drug-Eluting Stent Registry. Endpoints were stent-oriented outcomes (target lesion failure [TLF]) and patient-oriented composite outcomes (POCO) during a median follow-up of 35 months. CKD patients were stratified by the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from mild CKD to end-stage renal disease patients, and by the coexistence of diabetes mellitus (DM).
RESULTS: A total of 2,927 patients had CKD (23.6%), who showed a significantly higher risk of TLF (adjusted hazard ratio [HRadjust]: 1.50; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21 to 1.86) and POCO (HRadjust 1.34; 95% CI: 1.17 to 1.55) compared to patients with preserved renal function. Stratified analysis by eGFR showed that TLF was not increased in the mild to moderate CKD, whereas severe CKD and dialysis-dependent patients showed significantly higher risk of TLF (HRadjust 2.44; 95% CI: 1.54 to 3.86; HRadjust 3.58; 95% CI: 2.52 to 5.08, respectively). The eGFR threshold of increased clinical events was 40 to 45 ml/min/1.73 m2. Among CKD patients, DM CKD patients showed a higher incidence of TLF compared to non-DM CKD patients (HRadjust: 1.82; 95% CI: 1.32 to 2.52), driven by the increase in target vessel-related events.
CONCLUSIONS: In the era of second-generation DES, CKD patients were at a significantly higher risk of clinical outcomes only in severe CKD and end-stage renal disease patients.
BACKGROUND: Although second-generation DES have improved the safety and efficacy issues in PCI, data regarding the performance of second-generation DES in patients with CKD are still limited.
METHODS: We performed a patient-level pooled analysis on 12,426 patients undergoing PCI using second-generation DES from the Korean Multicenter Drug-Eluting Stent Registry. Endpoints were stent-oriented outcomes (target lesion failure [TLF]) and patient-oriented composite outcomes (POCO) during a median follow-up of 35 months. CKD patients were stratified by the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from mild CKD to end-stage renal disease patients, and by the coexistence of diabetes mellitus (DM).
RESULTS: A total of 2,927 patients had CKD (23.6%), who showed a significantly higher risk of TLF (adjusted hazard ratio [HRadjust]: 1.50; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21 to 1.86) and POCO (HRadjust 1.34; 95% CI: 1.17 to 1.55) compared to patients with preserved renal function. Stratified analysis by eGFR showed that TLF was not increased in the mild to moderate CKD, whereas severe CKD and dialysis-dependent patients showed significantly higher risk of TLF (HRadjust 2.44; 95% CI: 1.54 to 3.86; HRadjust 3.58; 95% CI: 2.52 to 5.08, respectively). The eGFR threshold of increased clinical events was 40 to 45 ml/min/1.73 m2. Among CKD patients, DM CKD patients showed a higher incidence of TLF compared to non-DM CKD patients (HRadjust: 1.82; 95% CI: 1.32 to 2.52), driven by the increase in target vessel-related events.
CONCLUSIONS: In the era of second-generation DES, CKD patients were at a significantly higher risk of clinical outcomes only in severe CKD and end-stage renal disease patients.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedComorbidityCoronary Artery DiseaseDiabetes MellitusDrug-Eluting StentsFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateKidneyKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedPercutaneous Coronary InterventionProportional Hazards ModelsProsthesis DesignRegistriesRenal DialysisRenal Insufficiency, ChronicRepublic of KoreaRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexTime FactorsTreatment Outcome