Current opinion in cardiology · 2009
International normalized ratio patient self-management for mechanical valves: is it safe enough?
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Koerfer Reiner, Reiss Nils, Koertke Heinrich
Аннотация
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: People with mechanical heart valve replacement depend on lifelong anticoagulation. Since a few years, patients can control this themselves with the assistance of a portable anticoagulation monitor. If the patient performs the complete self-testing and self-adjustment by himself, the method is called self-management. Recently completed studies concerning international normalized ratio (INR) self-management in mechanical heart valve patients are reviewed in this article.
RECENT FINDINGS: Large randomized prospective studies have demonstrated that the INR self-management concept results in well-trained patients with a high percentage of their measured INR values lying within the predetermined therapeutic range, thus resulting in a low rate of complications such as bleeding and thromboembolism. The reduced anticoagulation level resulted in fewer grade III bleeding complications (which means there is a need for surgery or endoscopy, in-hospital treatment or permanent damage) without increasing thromboembolic event rates.
SUMMARY: The concept of INR self-management is a promising tool to achieve low hemorrhagic complications without increasing the risk of thromboembolic complications. Data of the Early Self-Controlled Anticoagulation Trial (ESCAT II) study demonstrate that low-dose INR self-management does not increase the risk of thromboembolic events compared with conventional-dose INR self-management.
RECENT FINDINGS: Large randomized prospective studies have demonstrated that the INR self-management concept results in well-trained patients with a high percentage of their measured INR values lying within the predetermined therapeutic range, thus resulting in a low rate of complications such as bleeding and thromboembolism. The reduced anticoagulation level resulted in fewer grade III bleeding complications (which means there is a need for surgery or endoscopy, in-hospital treatment or permanent damage) without increasing thromboembolic event rates.
SUMMARY: The concept of INR self-management is a promising tool to achieve low hemorrhagic complications without increasing the risk of thromboembolic complications. Data of the Early Self-Controlled Anticoagulation Trial (ESCAT II) study demonstrate that low-dose INR self-management does not increase the risk of thromboembolic events compared with conventional-dose INR self-management.