Prosthetics and orthotics international · 2021
Altering the tuning parameter settings of a commercial powered prosthetic foot to increase power during push-off may not reduce collisional work in the intact limb during gait.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Davidson Audra M, Childers W Lee, Chang Young-Hui
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Increased knee osteoarthritis risk in patients with unilateral lower extremity limb loss is attributed to increased intact limb loading. Modulating powered ankle prosthesis push-off power may be an effective way to modulate intact limb loading. We examined how changes in the parameter settings of a commercial prosthetic ankle affect power delivery during push-off and the resulting collisional work experienced by the intact limb in persons with unilateral lower extremity limb loss.
METHODS: Five subjects with unilateral transtibial amputation were fitted with a commercially available powered ankle prosthesis (Ottobock Empower). Subjects walked on a treadmill in seven conditions, where ankle power delivery settings were adjusted using methods accessible to clinicians. Kinetics and kinematics data were collected.
RESULTS: Standard adjustment of parameter settings within the prosthetic foot did not alter timing of peak prosthesis power or intact limb collisional work but did have a significant effect on the magnitude of positive prosthesis ankle work. Increased prosthesis work did not decrease intact limb collisional work as predicted.
CONCLUSIONS: Altering the parameter settings on a commercial powered ankle prosthesis affected the magnitude, but not the timing, of power delivered. Increased prosthesis push-off power did not decrease intact limb loading.
METHODS: Five subjects with unilateral transtibial amputation were fitted with a commercially available powered ankle prosthesis (Ottobock Empower). Subjects walked on a treadmill in seven conditions, where ankle power delivery settings were adjusted using methods accessible to clinicians. Kinetics and kinematics data were collected.
RESULTS: Standard adjustment of parameter settings within the prosthetic foot did not alter timing of peak prosthesis power or intact limb collisional work but did have a significant effect on the magnitude of positive prosthesis ankle work. Increased prosthesis work did not decrease intact limb collisional work as predicted.
CONCLUSIONS: Altering the parameter settings on a commercial powered ankle prosthesis affected the magnitude, but not the timing, of power delivered. Increased prosthesis push-off power did not decrease intact limb loading.