Frontiers in public health · 2025
Young people's smoking and vaping behaviour, and comparative perceptions of appeal, imagery and harm, across different vape devices and a tobacco cigarette: findings from UK cross-sectional surveys in 2020 and 2023.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
MacKintosh Anne Marie, Mitchell Danielle, Hilton Shona, Smith Marissa, Ford Allison
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: After the introduction of a new generation of disposable vapes (e.g., Elf Bar) in the UK in 2021, there was a rapid increase in their use by young people and concern about their availability and marketing. This study examined young people's vaping and smoking between 2020 and 2023, and perceptions of a disposable vape, a tank model and a traditional cigarette, to examine whether disposable vapes may have contributed to the rise in youth vaping.
METHODS: Online cross-sectional surveys in 2020 (Youth Tobacco Policy Survey n = 2,121) and 2023 (Youth E-cigarettes Policy Survey n = 2,164) with 11-16-year-olds across the UK were conducted. Measures included demographics, vaping and vaping susceptibility, smoking and smoking susceptibility, type(s) of vapes used, and product ratings across 11 items/attributes covering product appeal, imagery and perceptions of harm.
RESULTS: Between 2020 and 2023, prevalence of ever smoking reduced from 12.2 to 9.3%, whilst ever vaping increased from 10.1 to 17.5%. Vaping experimentation was not confined to young people who had already tried smoking: in 2023, never smokers accounted for the majority of ever vapers (56.6%). Of those who had tried vaping, disposable vapes were the most commonly used device type, with 72.8% having used a disposable vape the first time they tried vaping. There was an association between having tried vaping and susceptibility to smoke. Disposable vapes were rated more favourably compared with a tank device on 9 of 11 items across appeal, imagery and harm (range adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 1.40-4.16; p < 0.001). Traditional cigarettes were rated less favourably than a tank device on all items (range AOR: 0.08-0.61; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: This study highlights the appeal of disposable vapes to young people. Causality cannot be inferred due to the cross-sectional design of the study, however, positive perceptions of disposable vapes across dimensions of appeal, imagery and harm, may have contributed to trends in youth vaping. Further monitoring of the nicotine market, product marketing, and young people's response is critical, particularly as the market adapts in response to the disposable vapes ban.
METHODS: Online cross-sectional surveys in 2020 (Youth Tobacco Policy Survey n = 2,121) and 2023 (Youth E-cigarettes Policy Survey n = 2,164) with 11-16-year-olds across the UK were conducted. Measures included demographics, vaping and vaping susceptibility, smoking and smoking susceptibility, type(s) of vapes used, and product ratings across 11 items/attributes covering product appeal, imagery and perceptions of harm.
RESULTS: Between 2020 and 2023, prevalence of ever smoking reduced from 12.2 to 9.3%, whilst ever vaping increased from 10.1 to 17.5%. Vaping experimentation was not confined to young people who had already tried smoking: in 2023, never smokers accounted for the majority of ever vapers (56.6%). Of those who had tried vaping, disposable vapes were the most commonly used device type, with 72.8% having used a disposable vape the first time they tried vaping. There was an association between having tried vaping and susceptibility to smoke. Disposable vapes were rated more favourably compared with a tank device on 9 of 11 items across appeal, imagery and harm (range adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 1.40-4.16; p < 0.001). Traditional cigarettes were rated less favourably than a tank device on all items (range AOR: 0.08-0.61; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: This study highlights the appeal of disposable vapes to young people. Causality cannot be inferred due to the cross-sectional design of the study, however, positive perceptions of disposable vapes across dimensions of appeal, imagery and harm, may have contributed to trends in youth vaping. Further monitoring of the nicotine market, product marketing, and young people's response is critical, particularly as the market adapts in response to the disposable vapes ban.