Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry · 2026
Psychophysiological responses to professional music therapy during pediatric exodontia: A randomized controlled trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shukla Balraj, Panda Anup
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine the effect of familiar or unfamiliar music with different rhythmic patterns on pediatric patients undergoing exodontia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-eighty children aged 5-9 years requiring dental extraction were divided into five groups based on the rhythmic pattern and familiarity of the musical interventions Group I (Control), Group II (Familiar-Synchronized), Group III (Familiar-Syncopated), Group IV (Unfamiliar-Synchronized), and Group V (Unfamiliar-Syncopated). During exodontia, a music therapist controlled the auditory input. Calibrated examiners assessed the patients' behavior, pain, and anxiety using the Houpt scale, the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability scale, and a pulse oximeter, respectively. The recorded data was tabulated and sent for statistical analysis using Python (v3.11) in the Julius Code Sandbox.
RESULTS: Intergroup comparisons using the Kruskal-Wallis test did not reveal a significant reduction in anxiety ( P > 0.05) and showed a marginally nonsignificant difference in behavior ( P = 0.07). Intragroup comparisons using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests showed a significant decrease in anxiety scores in Groups III ( P = 0.04) and IV ( P = 0.04). Nonparametric testing revealed no significant differences in pain between groups ( P = 0.70). Regression analysis and a goodness-of-fit test revealed that neither age nor gender influenced the patient, regardless of the intervention. Pooled contrasts for a simple linear regression model showed that comparisons among the interventional musical pieces were not clinically significant.
CONCLUSION: The rhythmic pattern or the patient's familiarity with the musical piece influenced the patient's behavior, anxiety, and pain assessment, but with no clinical significance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-eighty children aged 5-9 years requiring dental extraction were divided into five groups based on the rhythmic pattern and familiarity of the musical interventions Group I (Control), Group II (Familiar-Synchronized), Group III (Familiar-Syncopated), Group IV (Unfamiliar-Synchronized), and Group V (Unfamiliar-Syncopated). During exodontia, a music therapist controlled the auditory input. Calibrated examiners assessed the patients' behavior, pain, and anxiety using the Houpt scale, the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability scale, and a pulse oximeter, respectively. The recorded data was tabulated and sent for statistical analysis using Python (v3.11) in the Julius Code Sandbox.
RESULTS: Intergroup comparisons using the Kruskal-Wallis test did not reveal a significant reduction in anxiety ( P > 0.05) and showed a marginally nonsignificant difference in behavior ( P = 0.07). Intragroup comparisons using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests showed a significant decrease in anxiety scores in Groups III ( P = 0.04) and IV ( P = 0.04). Nonparametric testing revealed no significant differences in pain between groups ( P = 0.70). Regression analysis and a goodness-of-fit test revealed that neither age nor gender influenced the patient, regardless of the intervention. Pooled contrasts for a simple linear regression model showed that comparisons among the interventional musical pieces were not clinically significant.
CONCLUSION: The rhythmic pattern or the patient's familiarity with the musical piece influenced the patient's behavior, anxiety, and pain assessment, but with no clinical significance.