Journal of affective disorders · 2026
Fear of negative evaluation as a longitudinal mediator between maternal psychological control and social avoidance in adolescents: A cross-lagged panel model.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Văidean Tudor, Florean Ionuț-Stelian, Poetar Costina-Ruxandra, Roman Gabriela Diana, Dobrean Anca
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Although perceived maternal psychological control (pMPC) and fear of negative evaluation (FNE) are both well-established correlates of social anxiety, their longitudinal interplay with social avoidance remains poorly understood. The present study examined the temporal associations between pMPC, FNE, and social avoidance in a three-wave longitudinal design.
METHODS: Participants were 608 adolescents aged 10-16 years (Mage = 12.89) who completed self-report measures at three time points over six months. Cross-lagged panel models with latent variables were estimated, and multigroup analyses tested moderation by age and sex.
RESULTS: Across the full sample, pMPC predicted subsequent increases in FNE (T1 → T2: β = 0.04, p < .001), which in turn predicted higher levels of social avoidance (T2 → T3: β = 0.10, p < .001). The indirect effect of pMPC on avoidance via FNE was significant (p = .001), suggesting an indirect prospective pathway. Bidirectional associations between FNE and avoidance further indicated a self-reinforcing anxiety process. Importantly, these associations were not uniform across groups. The mediating pathway was significant only among boys, suggesting potential sex-specific transactional dynamics.
CONCLUSION: This study is the first to longitudinally demonstrate that FNE represents a prospective pathway, though modest in effect size, linking pMPC to anxious social avoidance in youth. The findings highlight the importance of considering cognitive mediators and child characteristics when examining family influences on adolescent social anxiety.
METHODS: Participants were 608 adolescents aged 10-16 years (Mage = 12.89) who completed self-report measures at three time points over six months. Cross-lagged panel models with latent variables were estimated, and multigroup analyses tested moderation by age and sex.
RESULTS: Across the full sample, pMPC predicted subsequent increases in FNE (T1 → T2: β = 0.04, p < .001), which in turn predicted higher levels of social avoidance (T2 → T3: β = 0.10, p < .001). The indirect effect of pMPC on avoidance via FNE was significant (p = .001), suggesting an indirect prospective pathway. Bidirectional associations between FNE and avoidance further indicated a self-reinforcing anxiety process. Importantly, these associations were not uniform across groups. The mediating pathway was significant only among boys, suggesting potential sex-specific transactional dynamics.
CONCLUSION: This study is the first to longitudinally demonstrate that FNE represents a prospective pathway, though modest in effect size, linking pMPC to anxious social avoidance in youth. The findings highlight the importance of considering cognitive mediators and child characteristics when examining family influences on adolescent social anxiety.