Acta psychologica · 2026
Coping with existential anxiety: How resilience, intolerance of uncertainty, and cognitive-emotion regulation shape mental health outcomes.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Smrke Urška, Plohl Nejc, Mlakar Izidor, Lampret Ana
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Existential anxiety (EA) is a transdiagnostic construct increasingly recognized for its role in the development of depression and anxiety. Despite its relevance, most research has focused only on a subset of EA and largely neglected the role of malleable moderating factors that could be addressed via psychotherapeutic practices, such as cognitive emotion regulation (CER) strategies, psychological resilience, and intolerance of uncertainty (IU), which are explored in the present study.
METHODS: Slovenian young adults (N = 330; M = 21.20 years, SD = 1.85; 63.3% female) participated in an online survey.
RESULTS: EA significantly predicted depression and anxiety. Psychological resilience buffered, while IU amplified the relationship between EA and both outcomes. Maladaptive CER strategies moderated the relationship between EA and general anxiety, whereas adaptive CER strategies did not moderate any investigated relationship. Specific CER strategies also showed differential effects: catastrophizing amplified the relationship for both outcomes while refocusing on planning buffered the relationship between EA and depression.
CONCLUSIONS: EA is associated with depression and general anxiety in young adults. While psychological resilience can mitigate these associations, IU and (certain) maladaptive CER strategies can intensify them. Findings suggest promising targets for therapeutic interventions to alleviate existential distress and improve emotional well-being.
METHODS: Slovenian young adults (N = 330; M = 21.20 years, SD = 1.85; 63.3% female) participated in an online survey.
RESULTS: EA significantly predicted depression and anxiety. Psychological resilience buffered, while IU amplified the relationship between EA and both outcomes. Maladaptive CER strategies moderated the relationship between EA and general anxiety, whereas adaptive CER strategies did not moderate any investigated relationship. Specific CER strategies also showed differential effects: catastrophizing amplified the relationship for both outcomes while refocusing on planning buffered the relationship between EA and depression.
CONCLUSIONS: EA is associated with depression and general anxiety in young adults. While psychological resilience can mitigate these associations, IU and (certain) maladaptive CER strategies can intensify them. Findings suggest promising targets for therapeutic interventions to alleviate existential distress and improve emotional well-being.