Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2026
Outcome and cost-effectiveness of transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral therapy compared with management as usual for youth with common mental health problems: Long-term results from the Mind-My-Mind randomized trial.
СтатьяPragmatic Clinical TrialМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеEquivalence TrialПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Vassard Ditte, Rimvall Martin Køster, Wolf Rasmus Trap, Christensen Robin, Nielsen Sabrina M, Plessen Kerstin Jessica, Verhulst Frank, Bilenberg Niels, Thomsen Per Hove, Thastum Mikael, Neumer Simon-Peter, Pagsberg Anne Katrine, Silverman Wendy K, Correll Christoph U, Jeppesen Pia
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Credible long-term outcomes from randomized trials evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of preventive programs for mental health problems are needed. We compared long-term effects of the Mind My Mind (MMM) transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) program to management as usual (MAU).
METHODS: The study was a pragmatic, multisite, randomized superiority trial (2017-2019) involving youths aged 6-16 years with anxiety, depressive symptoms, and/or behavioral disturbances, recruited through family self-referral. The MMM intervention included 9-13 weekly CBT sessions. The primary outcome was change from baseline in parent-reported impact of mental health problems at 3-year follow-up post-randomization using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) impact scale. Register-based outcomes tracked youths' psychiatric diagnoses in mental health services. To assess cost-effectiveness, we calculated the incremental costs and incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). All primary analyses followed the intention-to-treat (ITT) approach.
CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ID NCT04804917.
RESULTS: Among 396 youths randomized (baseline mean [SD] age, 10.3 [2.4] years; 52.0% boys; MMM n = 197, MAU n = 199), the 3-year follow-up (median 167 weeks; range 124-203 weeks) primary outcome data were available in 69.0% and 59.3%, respectively. The decrease in SDQ-impact-score from baseline to 3-year follow-up (4.12→1.79 points [MMM] and 4.21→1.85 [MAU]) was similar (between-group difference, 0.06 [95% CI -0.41 to 0.52]; p = .81). An equal proportion (25%) of youths in MMM and MAU were diagnosed with any mental disorder during follow-up (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.68-1.50). Total costs over the intervention period were higher in the MMM group (incremental costs 3,014 Euros [95% CI: 2.174-3.855]). Cost-effectiveness analyses favored MMM: QALY net gain 0.121 (95% CI 0.045-0.196); the cost-effectiveness ratio was 24,789 Euro/QALY.
CONCLUSIONS: Although MMM was potentially cost-effective, the beneficial effects diminished over 3 years post-treatment. The findings highlight the need for strategies to sustain long-term effects.
METHODS: The study was a pragmatic, multisite, randomized superiority trial (2017-2019) involving youths aged 6-16 years with anxiety, depressive symptoms, and/or behavioral disturbances, recruited through family self-referral. The MMM intervention included 9-13 weekly CBT sessions. The primary outcome was change from baseline in parent-reported impact of mental health problems at 3-year follow-up post-randomization using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) impact scale. Register-based outcomes tracked youths' psychiatric diagnoses in mental health services. To assess cost-effectiveness, we calculated the incremental costs and incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). All primary analyses followed the intention-to-treat (ITT) approach.
CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ID NCT04804917.
RESULTS: Among 396 youths randomized (baseline mean [SD] age, 10.3 [2.4] years; 52.0% boys; MMM n = 197, MAU n = 199), the 3-year follow-up (median 167 weeks; range 124-203 weeks) primary outcome data were available in 69.0% and 59.3%, respectively. The decrease in SDQ-impact-score from baseline to 3-year follow-up (4.12→1.79 points [MMM] and 4.21→1.85 [MAU]) was similar (between-group difference, 0.06 [95% CI -0.41 to 0.52]; p = .81). An equal proportion (25%) of youths in MMM and MAU were diagnosed with any mental disorder during follow-up (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.68-1.50). Total costs over the intervention period were higher in the MMM group (incremental costs 3,014 Euros [95% CI: 2.174-3.855]). Cost-effectiveness analyses favored MMM: QALY net gain 0.121 (95% CI 0.045-0.196); the cost-effectiveness ratio was 24,789 Euro/QALY.
CONCLUSIONS: Although MMM was potentially cost-effective, the beneficial effects diminished over 3 years post-treatment. The findings highlight the need for strategies to sustain long-term effects.