MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1044/2024_ajslp-24-00172

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of speech-language pathology · 2024

Comparative Effectiveness of In-Person and Virtual Picture-Naming Treatment for Poststroke Anomia.

Jewell Courtney C, Diedrichs Victoria A, Blackett Deena Schwen, Durfee Alexandra Zezinka, Harnish Stacy M

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: In light of COVID-19, telepractice for speech therapy has been increasingly adopted. Telepractice promotes accessibility to therapy services for those in rural environments, lowers the frequency of missed appointments, and reduces the costs of rehabilitation. The efficacy of telepractice has been scarcely explored in the aphasia literature. Preliminary research has demonstrated comparable results of telepractice and in-person therapy for people with aphasia, but the current scope of research is insufficient to guide clinical practice. The present study examined whether the virtual administration of a picture-naming therapy paradigm was as effective as in-person administration.

METHOD: The treatment effects of two similar clinical trials, one completed in-person (n = 13) and one completed virtually (n = 13), are compared. Participants were adults with chronic (> 6 months) poststroke aphasia. Both clinical trials administered Cued Picture-Naming Therapy 4 days a week for 2 weeks (eight treatment sessions). Treatment outcomes were analyzed using Tau-U effect sizes and Mann-Whitney U tests.

RESULTS

Weighted Tau-U averages showed an advantage of telepractice over in-person treatment in the acquisition effects of trained words, with participants demonstrating a very large effect (0.84, p < .01) following telepractice and a large effect (0.75, p < .01) following in-person treatment. Both telepractice and in-person rehabilitation demonstrated significant treatment effects and were not significantly different from each other per Mann-Whitney U independent-samples t tests.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrated that telepractice of a picture-naming paradigm is as effective as in-person treatment administration. This justifies the use of telepractice to overcome accessibility and cost barriers to speech therapy administration and justifies taking patient preference into account. Future research should explore the efficacy of telepractice for treatments that promote greater generalizability to functional communication.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.27641031.

Для цитирования: Jewell Courtney C, Diedrichs Victoria A, Blackett Deena Schwen, Durfee Alexandra Zezinka, Harnish Stacy M. Comparative Effectiveness of In-Person and Virtual Picture-Naming Treatment for Poststroke Anomia.. American journal of speech-language pathology. 2024. DOI: 10.1044/2024_ajslp-24-00172.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.