MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1017/s0022215116001201

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of laryngology and otology · 2016

Economic impact of recurrent respiratory papillomas in a UK adult population.

Harrison A, Montgomery J, Macgregor F B

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To calculate the financial burden of recurrent respiratory papilloma. This study is UK-based, where up until now no financial estimates have been calculated for this group of patients.

BACKGROUND

Recurrent respiratory papilloma is caused by the human papilloma virus (subtypes 6 and 11). The burden for the patient and the healthcare system is significant given the recurrent nature of the disease.

METHODS

Data were collected, using a questionnaire completed during routine clinical follow up, from a single centre managing recurrent respiratory papilloma in Glasgow, Scotland. Cost information was sourced from the Scottish Government's Information Services Division.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients with active recurrent respiratory papilloma between 2013 and 2014 were identified. The direct measurable cost to NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde amounted to £107 478.

CONCLUSION

Recurrent respiratory papilloma is a benign condition, but the financial implications of diagnosis are significant. Recurrent respiratory papilloma has a natural history of relapse and remission, and patients may require healthcare input over a period of several years.

Для цитирования: Harrison A, Montgomery J, Macgregor F B. Economic impact of recurrent respiratory papillomas in a UK adult population.. The Journal of laryngology and otology. 2016. DOI: 10.1017/s0022215116001201.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.