MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jfludis.2011.12.001

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of fluency disorders · 2011

Recounting the K-12 school experiences of adults who stutter: a qualitative analysis.

Daniels Derek E, Gabel Rodney M, Hughes Stephanie

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

UNLABELLED: This study qualitatively explored the primary and secondary (K-12) school experiences of adults who stutter. The primary investigator conducted semi-structured interviews with 11 participants, a first focus group interview with 6 participants, and a second focus group interview with 4 participants. Participants discussed the various ways in which stuttering affected their personality; emotional and psychological experiences in the context of school; academic and learning experiences; classroom participation; teacher and peer relationships; speech therapy experiences; school activity involvement; and post-educational experiences. Results suggest that school is a complex cultural environment in which students must engage on academic and social levels. People who stutter may experience observable and unobservable challenges as they navigate the complexity of school.

EDUCATIONAL

OBJECTIVES

After reading this article, the reader will be able to: (1) provide a rationale for the need to explore the school experiences of people who stutter; (2) describe the major themes associated with the school experiences of participants in the study; and (3) discuss how knowledge of school experiences can be useful to classroom teachers and speech-language pathologists.

Для цитирования: Daniels Derek E, Gabel Rodney M, Hughes Stephanie. Recounting the K-12 school experiences of adults who stutter: a qualitative analysis.. Journal of fluency disorders. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2011.12.001.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.