MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/17549507.2011.538434

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of speech-language pathology · 2011

North-American Lidcombe Program file audit: replication and meta-analysis.

Koushik Sarita, Hewat Sally, Shenker Rosalee C, Jones Mark, Onslow Mark

СтатьяМетаанализПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Thousands of North American clinicians have trained for the Lidcombe Program of Early Stuttering Intervention, yet there are no benchmark data for that continent. This retrospective file audit includes logistical regression of variables from files of 134 children younger than 6 years who completed Stage 1 of the Lidcombe Program. Benchmarking data for clinic visits to Stage 2 is available for these files. Meta-analysis supplements worldwide Lidcombe Program benchmark data. The median number of clinic visits to Stage 2 was 11. High pre-treatment stuttering severity predicted more clinic visits than low severity. A trend toward statistical significance was found for the frequency of clinic visits. Frequent attendance of mean less than 11 days was associated with longer treatment times than infrequent attendance of mean 11 days or more. Results for North America were consistent with benchmark data from the UK and Australia. The mean attendance trend is clinically important and requires further investigation because of its potential clinical significance.

Для цитирования: Koushik Sarita, Hewat Sally, Shenker Rosalee C, Jones Mark, Onslow Mark. North-American Lidcombe Program file audit: replication and meta-analysis.. International journal of speech-language pathology. 2011. DOI: 10.3109/17549507.2011.538434.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.