MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/13668250.2011.572547

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of intellectual & developmental disability · 2011

Expressive vocabulary acquisition in children with intellectual disability: speech or manual signs?

Vandereet Joke, Maes Bea, Lembrechts Dirk, Zink Inge

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to examine the degree to which children with intellectual disability (ID) depend on manual signs during their expressive vocabulary acquisition, in relation to child and social-environmental characteristics.

METHOD: Expressive vocabulary acquisition in speech and manual signs was monitored over a 2-year period in 23 children with ID using parent report. The children's cognitive, communicative, and vocabulary comprehension skills were measured at baseline. Speech-language pathologists' and parents' use of and attitudes towards manual signs were measured using self-report.

RESULTS

Four distinct profiles of vocabulary acquisition were evident. Those children who initially demonstrated the most significant cognitive, communicative, and comprehension delays acquired the smallest expressive vocabularies during follow-up, yet these variables were not related to the children's degree of dependence on manual signs.

CONCLUSIONS

Specific cognitive, communicative, and comprehension skills relate to vocabulary acquisition. The same skills that allow for speech development seem to be fundamental to the acquisition of manual signs.

Для цитирования: Vandereet Joke, Maes Bea, Lembrechts Dirk, Zink Inge. Expressive vocabulary acquisition in children with intellectual disability: speech or manual signs?. Journal of intellectual & developmental disability. 2011. DOI: 10.1080/13668250.2011.572547.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.