International journal of language & communication disorders · 2005
'Thinking for two': a case study of speech and language therapists working through assistants.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
McCartney Elspeth, Boyle James, Bannatyne Susan, Jessiman Emma, Campbell Cathy, Kelsey Cherry, Smith Jennifer, McArthur Jane, O'Hare Anne
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Many speech and language therapists (SLTs) in the UK work with speech and language therapy assistants, and the numbers of SLT assistants is expected to grow. There has been very little empirical investigation of how SLTs feel about this situation or the effect on working practices of working indirectly.
AIMS: To investigate SLTs' opinions on working with SLT assistants in a small-scale research case study.
METHODS AND PROCEDURES: The study design was a case study of five SLTs delivering intervention within a research intervention project. Prepared questionnaire and formal interview techniques were used to elicit opinions on working through assistants, and a content analysis was performed.
OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Although respondents could see value in working through assistants, they stressed the time required to do so and the difficulties of adapting and updating therapy plans when working indirectly.
CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests a variety of factors that have to be carefully managed if SLTs are to work competently through assistants.
AIMS: To investigate SLTs' opinions on working with SLT assistants in a small-scale research case study.
METHODS AND PROCEDURES: The study design was a case study of five SLTs delivering intervention within a research intervention project. Prepared questionnaire and formal interview techniques were used to elicit opinions on working through assistants, and a content analysis was performed.
OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Although respondents could see value in working through assistants, they stressed the time required to do so and the difficulties of adapting and updating therapy plans when working indirectly.
CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests a variety of factors that have to be carefully managed if SLTs are to work competently through assistants.