MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1038/s41467-026-70267-9

Медицинская библиотека · Nature communications · 2026

Neural circuit models for evidence accumulation through choice-selective sequences.

Brown Lindsey S, Cho Jounhong Ryan, Bolkan Scott S, Nieh Edward H, Schottdorf Manuel, Tank David W, Brody Carlos D, Witten Ilana B, Goldman Mark S

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Decision making is traditionally thought to be mediated by neurons that accumulate evidence through persistent activity. However, recent decision-making experiments in rodents have observed neurons across the brain that fire sequentially, rather than persistently, with the subset of neurons in the sequence depending on the animal's choice. We developed two candidate circuit models in which neurons are active sequentially and transfer evidence faithfully to the next active population. One model encodes evidence in the relative firing of two competing chains of neurons, and the other in the network location of a stereotyped, bump-like pattern of neural activity. Neural recordings from four brain regions during an evidence accumulation task revealed that different regions displayed evidence tuning consistent with different candidate models. This work provides a mechanistic explanation for how graded information may be precisely accumulated within and transferred between neural populations, and suggests that different brain regions may accumulate evidence through different circuit mechanisms.

Для цитирования: Brown Lindsey S, Cho Jounhong Ryan, Bolkan Scott S, Nieh Edward H, Schottdorf Manuel, Tank David W, Brody Carlos D, Witten Ilana B, Goldman Mark S. Neural circuit models for evidence accumulation through choice-selective sequences.. Nature communications. 2026. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-026-70267-9.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.