MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080822

Медицинская библиотека · BMJ open · 2024

Patient, caregiver and other knowledge user engagement in consensus-building healthcare initiatives: a scoping review protocol.

Munce Sarah E P, Wong Elliott, Luong Dorothy, Rao Justin, Cunningham Jessie, Bailey Katherine, John Tomisin, Barber Claire, Batthish Michelle, Chambers Kyle, Cleverley Kristin, Crabtree Marilyn, Diaz Sanober, Dimitropoulos Gina, Gorter Jan Willem, Grahovac Danijela, Grimes Ruth, Guttman Beverly, Hébert Michèle L, Henze Megan, Higgins Amanda, Khodyakov Dmitry, Li Elaine, Lo Lisha, Macgregor Laura, Mooney Sarah, Severino Samadhi Mora, Mukerji Geetha, Penner Melanie, Pidduck Jacklynn, Shulman Rayzel, Stromquist Lisa, Trbovich Patricia, Wan Michelle, Williams Laura, Yates Darryl, Toulany Alene

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Patient engagement and integrated knowledge translation (iKT) processes improve health outcomes and care experiences through meaningful partnerships in consensus-building initiatives and research. Consensus-building is essential for engaging a diverse group of experienced knowledge users in co-developing and supporting a solution where none readily exists or is less optimal. Patients and caregivers provide invaluable insights for building consensus in decision-making around healthcare, policy and research. However, despite emerging evidence, patient engagement remains sparse within consensus-building initiatives. Specifically, our research has identified a lack of opportunity for youth living with chronic health conditions and their caregivers to participate in developing consensus on indicators/benchmarks for transition into adult care. To bridge this gap and inform our consensus-building approach with youth/caregivers, this scoping review will synthesise the extent of the literature on patient and other knowledge user engagement in consensus-building healthcare initiatives.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Following the scoping review methodology from Joanna Briggs Institute, published literature will be searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO databases from inception to July 2023. Grey literature will be hand-searched. Two independent reviewers will determine the eligibility of articles in a two-stage process, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Included studies must be consensus-building studies within the healthcare context that involve patient engagement strategies. Data from eligible studies will be extracted and charted on a standardised form. Abstracted data will be analysed quantitatively and descriptively, according to specific consensus methodologies, and patient engagement models and/or strategies.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for this scoping review protocol. The review process and findings will be shared with and informed by relevant knowledge users. Dissemination of findings will also include peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. The results will offer new insights for supporting patient engagement in consensus-building healthcare initiatives.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: https://osf.io/beqjr.

Для цитирования: Munce Sarah E P, Wong Elliott, Luong Dorothy, Rao Justin, Cunningham Jessie, Bailey Katherine, John Tomisin, Barber Claire, Batthish Michelle, Chambers Kyle, Cleverley Kristin, Crabtree Marilyn, Diaz Sanober, Dimitropoulos Gina, Gorter Jan Willem, Grahovac Danijela, Grimes Ruth, Guttman Beverly, Hébert Michèle L, Henze Megan, Higgins Amanda, Khodyakov Dmitry, Li Elaine, Lo Lisha, Macgregor Laura, Mooney Sarah, Severino Samadhi Mora, Mukerji Geetha, Penner Melanie, Pidduck Jacklynn, Shulman Rayzel, Stromquist Lisa, Trbovich Patricia, Wan Michelle, Williams Laura, Yates Darryl, Toulany Alene. Patient, caregiver and other knowledge user engagement in consensus-building healthcare initiatives: a scoping review protocol.. BMJ open. 2024. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080822.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.