MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/psyg.12212

Медицинская библиотека · Psychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society · 2016

Comparison between group and personal rehabilitation for dementia in a geriatric health service facility: single-blinded randomized controlled study.

Tanaka Shigeya, Honda Shin, Nakano Hajime, Sato Yuko, Araya Kazufumi, Yamaguchi Haruyasu

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of rehabilitation involving group and personal sessions on demented participants.

METHODS

This single-blinded randomized controlled trial included 60 elderly participants with dementia in a geriatric health service facility, or R oken. Staff members, who did not participate in the intervention, examined cognitive function, mood, communication ability, severity of dementia, objective quality of life, vitality, and daily behaviour. After a baseline assessment, participants were randomly divided into three groups: (i) group intervention; (ii) personal intervention; and (iii) control. The 1-h group intervention (3-5 subjects) and 20-min personal intervention (one staff member per participant) were performed twice a week for 12 weeks (24 total sessions). The cognitive rehabilitation programme consisted of reminiscence, reality orientation, and physical exercise, and it was based on five principles of brain-activating rehabilitation; (i) pleasant atmosphere; (ii) communication; (iii) social roles; (iv) praising; and (v) errorless support. Data were analyzed after the second assessment.

RESULTS

Outcome measures were analyzed in 43 participants-14 in the control group, 13 in group intervention, and 16 in personal intervention. Repeated measure ancova showed a significant interaction for cognitive function score (Mini-Mental State Examination) between group intervention and controls ( F  = 5.535, P = 0.029). In the post-hoc analysis, group intervention showed significant improvement (P = 0.016). Global severity of dementia tended to improve (P = 0.094) in group intervention compared to control (Mann-Whitney U -test). There were no significant interactions or improvements for other measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

Group rehabilitation for dementia is more effective for improving cognitive function and global severity of dementia than personal rehabilitation in Roken.

Для цитирования: Tanaka Shigeya, Honda Shin, Nakano Hajime, Sato Yuko, Araya Kazufumi, Yamaguchi Haruyasu. Comparison between group and personal rehabilitation for dementia in a geriatric health service facility: single-blinded randomized controlled study.. Psychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society. 2016. DOI: 10.1111/psyg.12212.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.