Biological psychiatry · 2005
Neurologic examination abnormalities in children with bipolar disorder or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаResearch Support, N.I.H., IntramuralПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dickstein Daniel P, Garvey Marjorie, Pradella Anne G, Greenstein Deanna K, Sharp Wendy S, Castellanos F Xavier, Pine Daniel S, Leibenluft Ellen
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and bipolar disorder (BPD) are frequently comorbid and overlapping diagnoses. To move beyond diagnosis toward unique pathophysiology, we evaluated both ADHD and BPD children for neurologic examination abnormalities (NEAs) in comparison with normal control (NC) children.
METHODS: We performed the Revised Physical and Neurological Examination for Soft Signs in three groups (ADHD, BPD, NC). Then, a rater blind to diagnosis evaluated their motor performance. Results were analyzed with a multiple analysis of covariance.
RESULTS: Subjects with ADHD were impaired on repetitive task reaction time. In contrast, pediatric BPD subjects, both with and without comorbid ADHD, were impaired on sequential task reaction time.
CONCLUSIONS: This differential pattern of NEAs by diagnosis suggests pathophysiologic differences between ADHD and BPD in children. Repetitive motor performance requires inhibition of nonrelevant movements; ADHD subjects' impairment in this domain supports the hypothesis that ADHD involves a core deficit of fronto-striato-basal ganglia neurocircuitry. In contrast, BPD subjects' impaired sequential motor performance is consistent with behavioral data showing impaired attentional set-shifting and reversal learning in BPD subjects. Further study, going beyond symptom description to determine pathophysiologic differences, is required to refine neuronal models of these often comorbid diagnoses.
METHODS: We performed the Revised Physical and Neurological Examination for Soft Signs in three groups (ADHD, BPD, NC). Then, a rater blind to diagnosis evaluated their motor performance. Results were analyzed with a multiple analysis of covariance.
RESULTS: Subjects with ADHD were impaired on repetitive task reaction time. In contrast, pediatric BPD subjects, both with and without comorbid ADHD, were impaired on sequential task reaction time.
CONCLUSIONS: This differential pattern of NEAs by diagnosis suggests pathophysiologic differences between ADHD and BPD in children. Repetitive motor performance requires inhibition of nonrelevant movements; ADHD subjects' impairment in this domain supports the hypothesis that ADHD involves a core deficit of fronto-striato-basal ganglia neurocircuitry. In contrast, BPD subjects' impaired sequential motor performance is consistent with behavioral data showing impaired attentional set-shifting and reversal learning in BPD subjects. Further study, going beyond symptom description to determine pathophysiologic differences, is required to refine neuronal models of these often comorbid diagnoses.