Annales pharmaceutiques francaises · 2019
[Continuous theoretical training in onco-hematology for pharmacy technician's working in cytotoxic preparation unit].
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Moine M, Clou E, Bonsergent M, Sankhare D, Madelaine I, Jourdan N
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Within the context of pharmacy technician's (PT) continuing training (CT), a theoretical instruction in onco-hematology has been developed for PT working in our cytotoxic preparation unit (CPU). The aim of this study is to describe the approach taken, tools used and present knowledge assessment (KA).
METHODS: A previous KA has been conducted using quiz available on GERPAC website which listing 36 drugs. Forty-five minutes sessions were conducted. KA was assessing before and after each session and 2 years after. PT appreciation was also evaluated.
RESULTS: The previous KA served to targeting gaps and insisted on: indications, mechanism of action and cytotoxic drugs costs. Interactive sessions were led by a pharmacist and concerned about 17 diseases and 3 of the most prescribed cytotoxic drugs: 47 drugs summaries have been written by a pharmacist. The before-after knowledge improvement is significant (P>0.0005) (average [a] before=4.7 vs. a after=9.6). Two years after, this was non-significant but assessment results remain higher than before sessions (a=4.7 vs. 6.8). All PT wish sessions sustainability, 92% reported an adequate comprehension level.
CONCLUSION: Lack of time and staff constitute a brake for sustaining and this was also highlighted by other units. Share this experience on a web platform could be interesting. Nevertheless, supports used during sessions should be suitable in conformity with the hospital practice and updated with new therapeutic.
METHODS: A previous KA has been conducted using quiz available on GERPAC website which listing 36 drugs. Forty-five minutes sessions were conducted. KA was assessing before and after each session and 2 years after. PT appreciation was also evaluated.
RESULTS: The previous KA served to targeting gaps and insisted on: indications, mechanism of action and cytotoxic drugs costs. Interactive sessions were led by a pharmacist and concerned about 17 diseases and 3 of the most prescribed cytotoxic drugs: 47 drugs summaries have been written by a pharmacist. The before-after knowledge improvement is significant (P>0.0005) (average [a] before=4.7 vs. a after=9.6). Two years after, this was non-significant but assessment results remain higher than before sessions (a=4.7 vs. 6.8). All PT wish sessions sustainability, 92% reported an adequate comprehension level.
CONCLUSION: Lack of time and staff constitute a brake for sustaining and this was also highlighted by other units. Share this experience on a web platform could be interesting. Nevertheless, supports used during sessions should be suitable in conformity with the hospital practice and updated with new therapeutic.