European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology · 2012
Antitumor effectiveness of electrochemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяМетаанализПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mali B, Jarm T, Snoj M, Sersa G, Miklavcic D
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This systematic review has two purposes: to consolidate the current knowledge about clinical effectiveness of electrochemotherapy, a highly effective local therapy for cutaneous and subcutaneous tumors; and to investigate the differences in effectiveness of electrochemotherapy with respect to tumor type, chemotherapeutic drug, and route of drug administration.
METHODS: All necessary steps for a systematic review were applied: formulation of research question, systematic search of literature, study selection and data extraction using independent screening process, assessment of risk of bias, and statistical data analysis using two-sided common statistical methods and meta-analysis. Studies were eligible for the review if they provided data about effectiveness of single-session electrochemotherapy of cutaneous or subcutaneous tumors in various treatment conditions.
RESULTS: In total, 44 studies involving 1894 tumors were included in the review. Data analysis confirmed that electrochemotherapy had significantly (p < .001) higher effectiveness (by more than 50%) than bleomycin or cisplatin alone. The effectiveness was significantly higher for intratumoral than for intravenous administration of bleomycin (p < .001 for CR%, p = .028 for OR%). Bleomycin and cisplatin administered intratumorally resulted in equal effectiveness of electrochemotherapy. Electrochemotherapy was more effective in sarcoma than in melanoma or carcinoma tumors.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this review shed new light on effectiveness of electrochemotherapy and can be used for prediction of tumor response to electrochemotherapy with respect to various treatment conditions and should be taken into account for further refinement of electrochemotherapy protocols.
METHODS: All necessary steps for a systematic review were applied: formulation of research question, systematic search of literature, study selection and data extraction using independent screening process, assessment of risk of bias, and statistical data analysis using two-sided common statistical methods and meta-analysis. Studies were eligible for the review if they provided data about effectiveness of single-session electrochemotherapy of cutaneous or subcutaneous tumors in various treatment conditions.
RESULTS: In total, 44 studies involving 1894 tumors were included in the review. Data analysis confirmed that electrochemotherapy had significantly (p < .001) higher effectiveness (by more than 50%) than bleomycin or cisplatin alone. The effectiveness was significantly higher for intratumoral than for intravenous administration of bleomycin (p < .001 for CR%, p = .028 for OR%). Bleomycin and cisplatin administered intratumorally resulted in equal effectiveness of electrochemotherapy. Electrochemotherapy was more effective in sarcoma than in melanoma or carcinoma tumors.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this review shed new light on effectiveness of electrochemotherapy and can be used for prediction of tumor response to electrochemotherapy with respect to various treatment conditions and should be taken into account for further refinement of electrochemotherapy protocols.