International archives of allergy and immunology · 2011
Malignancy and specific allergen immunotherapy: the results of a case series.
Клинический случайСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wöhrl Stefan, Kinaciyan Tamar, Jalili Ahmad, Stingl Georg, Moritz Katharina B
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Specific immunotherapy with allergen is the only causative treatment for IgE-mediated allergies such as stinging insect allergy or hay fever and works by the induction of blocking antibodies and regulatory T lymphocytes.
OBJECTIVE: Does a hypothetical obstruction of tumor surveillance presupposing the induction of regulatory T cells really justify detaining immunotherapy to oncologic patients as suggested by recent guidelines?
METHODS: We report 6 patients (4 female, 2 male) suffering or having suffered from stage 1 cancer (4 melanomas, 1 lung cancer, 1 breast cancer) and concomitant IgE-mediated allergy. Four of them had a history of severe anaphylactic reactions to the insect yellow jacket, the 5th suffered from allergic rhinoconjunctivitis to dust mites, and the 6th to grass/rye pollen.
RESULTS: Between 2004 and 2010, subcutaneous immunotherapy was safely performed in 5 patients without signs of tumor reactivation. The cancer in 2 of them was diagnosed immediately after specific immunotherapy had been initiated and in another 2 the active cancer phase had already finished years before; the 5th suffered from a relapse around the time of the initiation of immunotherapy. At the time of the writing of the manuscript, 4 of them had already concluded 3 years of treatment, another one almost 1 year. The melanoma in the 6th patient was diagnosed 5 months after reaching the maintenance dose. Immunotherapy with grass/rye pollen was aborted in this patient based on current guidelines.
CONCLUSIONS: Specific immunotherapy was safely administered in patients suffering concomitantly from IgE-mediated allergy and lower stage cancer.
OBJECTIVE: Does a hypothetical obstruction of tumor surveillance presupposing the induction of regulatory T cells really justify detaining immunotherapy to oncologic patients as suggested by recent guidelines?
METHODS: We report 6 patients (4 female, 2 male) suffering or having suffered from stage 1 cancer (4 melanomas, 1 lung cancer, 1 breast cancer) and concomitant IgE-mediated allergy. Four of them had a history of severe anaphylactic reactions to the insect yellow jacket, the 5th suffered from allergic rhinoconjunctivitis to dust mites, and the 6th to grass/rye pollen.
RESULTS: Between 2004 and 2010, subcutaneous immunotherapy was safely performed in 5 patients without signs of tumor reactivation. The cancer in 2 of them was diagnosed immediately after specific immunotherapy had been initiated and in another 2 the active cancer phase had already finished years before; the 5th suffered from a relapse around the time of the initiation of immunotherapy. At the time of the writing of the manuscript, 4 of them had already concluded 3 years of treatment, another one almost 1 year. The melanoma in the 6th patient was diagnosed 5 months after reaching the maintenance dose. Immunotherapy with grass/rye pollen was aborted in this patient based on current guidelines.
CONCLUSIONS: Specific immunotherapy was safely administered in patients suffering concomitantly from IgE-mediated allergy and lower stage cancer.