Clinical drug investigation · 2019
Prediction Model for Significant Bleeding in Patients with Supratherapeutic International Normalized Ratio After Oral Administration of Warfarin.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pourafkari Leili, Baghbani-Oskouei Aidin, Savadi-Oskouei Safa, Ghaffari Samad, Parizad Raziye, Tajlil Arezou, Nader Nader D
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The use and range of indications for anticoagulation therapy are steadily growing. The objective of this study was to develop a scoring model to predict the occurrence of significant bleeding in patients taking warfarin with a supra-therapeutic international normalized ratio.
METHODS: Data were collected from the medical records of patients taking warfarin with an international normalized ratio > 3.5. The characteristics of bleeding episodes and the need for transfusion of blood products were recorded. Regression models were constructed to predict the occurrence of significant bleeding (requiring a transfusion of more than 2 units of packed red blood cells, intrapericardial or intracranial hemorrhage). The predictive values of previously published scores (ATRIA: anemia, hypertension, severe renal disease, age ≥ 75 years, or prior bleeding history; and ORBIT: old, reduced hemoglobin, bleeding history, kidney insufficiency or antiplatelet treatment) were compared with our New Bleeding Score (NBLDSCOR); the areas under the curve for the receiver-operating characteristic plots were compared using a non-parametric DeLong test.
RESULTS: Significant bleeding was reported in 87 out of 389 admitted patients. With an area under the curve of 0.736 ± 0.032, NBLDSCOR was the best predictor of significant bleeding in this population. Neither ATRIA nor ORBIT was a good predictor of significant bleeding, where the area under the curve for the receiver-operating characteristic plot for ATRIA was 0.654 ± 0.034 and for ORBIT was 0.604 ± 0.033. The predictive power of NBLDSCOR was superior to ATRIA and ORBIT (p < 0.001), while there was no meaningful difference in the predictive powers of ATRIA and ORBIT.
CONCLUSION: The NBLDSCOR including age, negative Rhesus factor, low hemoglobin, renal impairment, and concomitant peptic ulcer and disseminated cancer is a good predictor of significant bleeding in this patient population.
METHODS: Data were collected from the medical records of patients taking warfarin with an international normalized ratio > 3.5. The characteristics of bleeding episodes and the need for transfusion of blood products were recorded. Regression models were constructed to predict the occurrence of significant bleeding (requiring a transfusion of more than 2 units of packed red blood cells, intrapericardial or intracranial hemorrhage). The predictive values of previously published scores (ATRIA: anemia, hypertension, severe renal disease, age ≥ 75 years, or prior bleeding history; and ORBIT: old, reduced hemoglobin, bleeding history, kidney insufficiency or antiplatelet treatment) were compared with our New Bleeding Score (NBLDSCOR); the areas under the curve for the receiver-operating characteristic plots were compared using a non-parametric DeLong test.
RESULTS: Significant bleeding was reported in 87 out of 389 admitted patients. With an area under the curve of 0.736 ± 0.032, NBLDSCOR was the best predictor of significant bleeding in this population. Neither ATRIA nor ORBIT was a good predictor of significant bleeding, where the area under the curve for the receiver-operating characteristic plot for ATRIA was 0.654 ± 0.034 and for ORBIT was 0.604 ± 0.033. The predictive power of NBLDSCOR was superior to ATRIA and ORBIT (p < 0.001), while there was no meaningful difference in the predictive powers of ATRIA and ORBIT.
CONCLUSION: The NBLDSCOR including age, negative Rhesus factor, low hemoglobin, renal impairment, and concomitant peptic ulcer and disseminated cancer is a good predictor of significant bleeding in this patient population.