Nature communications · 2026
Social implications of the 30×30 global conservation target.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fajardo Javier, Bingham Heather C, Brockington Dan, Chaplin-Kramer Rebecca, Fitzsimons James A, Fleischman Forrest, Frechette Alain, Garrett Rachael D, Hazin Carolina, Kuemmerle Tobias, Lessmann Janeth, Nuvunga Milagre O F, O'Donnell Brian, Onyai Fred, Pinto Ruth, Pfeifer Marion, Pritchard Rose, Ryan Casey M, Shyamsundar Priya, Tauli Josefa Cariño, Tumusiime David Mwesigye, Upton Jasmin, Watmough Gary R, Zaehringer Julie G, Sandbrook Chris
Аннотация
Target 3 of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework aims to increase global protected and conserved area coverage to at least 30% by 2030. The impact on people, whether positive or negative, will depend on the social context of additional areas and how they are governed and managed. Here, we show that Target 3 could affect large and socially diverse populations under different implementation scenarios. Nearly half the human population lives within 10 km of areas included in a scenario maximising biodiversity representation. Four percent live near areas included in an Indigenous and traditional territories-based scenario, including many in areas with low Human Development Index scores (74%) and high participation in wild harvesting (91%). A scenario prioritising nature's contributions to people is intermediate on all measures. Our results demonstrate that Target 3 is a highly ambitious social as well as ecological target, requiring an equally ambitious commitment to development funding and support for local residents.