m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026

Conducting a randomized controlled clinical trial on palliative care in patients with glioblastoma - what are the challenges?

СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Joshi Melanie, Nettekoven Charlotte, Kochs Sophia, Appelmann Iris, Bausewein Claudia, Becker Gerhild, Boehlke Christopher, Brumbarova Tzvetina, Civello Daniele, Clusmann Hans, Goldbrunner Roland, Haberland Birgit, Heiland Dieter Henrik, Hellmich Martin, Herrlinger Ulrich, Jaspers Birgit, Müller Dirk, Müller Wiebke, Na Chuh-Hyoun, Neukirchen Martin, Radbruch Lukas, Rapp Marion, Rolke Roman, Ruge Maximilian I, Sabel Michael, Schnell Oliver, Schwartz Jacqueline, Thon Niklas, Vatter Hartmut, von Baumgarten Louisa, Voltz Raymond, Golla Heidrun, EPCOG Study Group

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Patients with glioblastoma represent a highly vulnerable cohort as they often experience rapid health deterioration with severe symptom burden including neurological, (neuro)psychological, and psychiatric symptoms. The aim of this sub-analysis of the "Early Palliative Care for Patients with Glioblastoma" (EPCOG) trial was to investigate the specific challenges of conducting a multicenter, randomized, controlled, clinical trial in glioblastoma patients testing a specialized palliative care (PC) intervention.

METHODS: We analyzed screening protocols and protocol deviations with respect to number and reasons for non-participation, skipped/delayed visits and attrition using descriptive statistics and content analysis of free-text comments.

RESULTS: In total, 41.5% of 556 screened patients were enrolled. Main reasons for non-participation were lack of interest (25.7%) and low functional status (11.5%). Attrition due to death (57.6%) was higher than due to illness (5.2%) or other reasons (21.2%). Main reasons for visit deviations were structural issues (in > 50% of neurosurgical visits), health status, and patient request. Protocol deviations showed that specialized PC intervention visits were least frequently skipped (4.5%) compared to study-specific outcome assessment (10.1%) and neurosurgical (43.3%) visits. Further, only 11.0% of the specialized PC intervention visits were delayed compared to 22.3% of the outcome assessment and 56.4% of the neurosurgical visits.

CONCLUSION: In this clinical trial involving glioblastoma patients, a high level of motivation among the study participants could be reached, as reflected by low protocol deviations during the specialized PC intervention and study-specific outcome assessment visits. Reasons for this might be a close guidance as well as a patient and caregiver-oriented communication, e.g., by a personal contact of the PC team in the intervention group, personal outcome assessment visits at patients' whereabouts, or the inclusion of a study nurse at each site. Considering the high vulnerability of glioblastoma patients is crucial when designing and conducting clinical trials.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты