Jornal de pediatria · 2026
Community-based pediatric palliative care: a systematic review of structures, processes, and outcomes.
Систематический обзорСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Acuña-Caicedo Sergio Andres, González-Brossard Aura Gisela, Pérez-González Laury Ellen, Arcia-Gálvez María Eugenia, Sánchez-Cárdenas Miguel Antonio
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the structure, processes, and outcomes of different models of community-based palliative care of children, adolescents, and their families reported in the literature.
METHODS: The authors conducted a systematic review of original, full-text studies in MEDLINE and Embase (January 2014-May 2024), following PRISMA. Two reviewers screened/extracted data; a third resolved disagreements. Study quality and reporting were appraised with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and, as applicable, STROBE, COREQ, and CARE. Narrative synthesis was organized with Donabedian's framework.
PROSPERO: CRD42018747214.
RESULTS: Twenty-six high-quality studies (5 qualitative, 18 quantitative, 3 mixed-methods) described community PPC across home-based services, outpatient programs, community health and social support centers. Common structures included multidisciplinary teams with 24/7 availability, assistive devices/equipment, telemedicine, and screening/assessment tools (e.g., PedsQL, PedsQL-FIM, PIP, PaPaS). Core processes were home visits, caregiver education, symptom monitoring (including digital tools), advance care planning, interprofessional teamwork, and coordination with schools and social services. Reported outcomes most frequently included reduced hospital admissions and emergency use, improved symptom control and health-related quality of life, higher caregiver satisfaction, and lower parenting stress; however, measures and follow-up were heterogeneous.
CONCLUSIONS: Community-based PPC can improve children's and families' quality of life when medical, psychosocial, and social resources are integrated beyond the hospital. To advance the field, validated outcome measures, sustainable financing, workforce training, and stronger policy frameworks are urgently needed.
METHODS: The authors conducted a systematic review of original, full-text studies in MEDLINE and Embase (January 2014-May 2024), following PRISMA. Two reviewers screened/extracted data; a third resolved disagreements. Study quality and reporting were appraised with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and, as applicable, STROBE, COREQ, and CARE. Narrative synthesis was organized with Donabedian's framework.
PROSPERO: CRD42018747214.
RESULTS: Twenty-six high-quality studies (5 qualitative, 18 quantitative, 3 mixed-methods) described community PPC across home-based services, outpatient programs, community health and social support centers. Common structures included multidisciplinary teams with 24/7 availability, assistive devices/equipment, telemedicine, and screening/assessment tools (e.g., PedsQL, PedsQL-FIM, PIP, PaPaS). Core processes were home visits, caregiver education, symptom monitoring (including digital tools), advance care planning, interprofessional teamwork, and coordination with schools and social services. Reported outcomes most frequently included reduced hospital admissions and emergency use, improved symptom control and health-related quality of life, higher caregiver satisfaction, and lower parenting stress; however, measures and follow-up were heterogeneous.
CONCLUSIONS: Community-based PPC can improve children's and families' quality of life when medical, psychosocial, and social resources are integrated beyond the hospital. To advance the field, validated outcome measures, sustainable financing, workforce training, and stronger policy frameworks are urgently needed.