DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.06.156
"False friends" in Language Subcortical Mapping: A Systematic Literature Review.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Subcortical brain mapping in awake glioma surgery might optimize the extent of resection while minimizing neurological morbidity, but it requires a correct interpretation of responses evoked during surgery. To define, with a systematic review: 1) a comprehensive 'map' of the principal white matter bundles involved in awake surgery on language-related networks, describing the most employed tests and the expected responses; 2) In linguistics, a false friend is a word in a different language that looks or sounds like a word in given language but differs significantly in meaning. Similarly, our aim is to give the surgeons a comprehensive review of potentially misleading responses, namely "false friends", in subcortical language mapping.
METHODS
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. Standardized data extraction was conducted.
RESULTS
Out of a total of 224 initial papers, 67 were included for analysis. Expected responses, common tests, and potential "false friends" were recorded for each of the following white matter bundles: frontal aslant tract, superior and inferior longitudinal fascicles, arcuate fascicle, inferior fronto-occipital fascicle, uncinate fascicle. Practical examples are discussed to underline the risk of intraoperative fallouts ("false friends") that might lead to an early interruption (false positive) or a risky surgical removal (false negative).
CONCLUSIONS
This paper represents a critical review of the present status of subcortical awake mapping and underlines practical "false-friend" in mapping critical crossroads in language-related networks.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.