Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU · 2019
A comparison of noninvasive methods for early detection of hemorrhage: Inferior vena cava ultrasonography and spectrophotometric hemoglobin levels.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yamanoglu Adnan, Celebi Yamanoglu Nalan Gokce, Sogut Ozgur, Yigit Mehmet, Tas Demet, Saclı Neslihan, Topal Fatih Esad
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Blood hemoglobin concentration measurements using a spectrophotometric method (SpHb), and inferior vena cava ultrasonography (IVC-US) are noninvasive methods used to follow-up hemorrhages. We compared their efficacy using voluntary blood donation as a model of moderate (approx. 500 mL) blood loss.
METHODS: In this prospective observational study enrolling blood-donor volunteers (BD) and matched controls, we recorded SpHb, IVC diameters, and vital signs. Changes in variables from baseline were compared between BD and controls using the paired t test and Wilcoxon signed rank test.
RESULTS: We included 118 subjects in the BD group and 95 healthy subjects in the control group. Changes in IVC maximum diameter, IVC minimum diameter, pulse rate, mean arterial pressure, pulse pressure, and shock index, but not in other variables, were significantly different in the BD and the control group (P < 0.05). IVCmax ≥1.1 mm yielded a 74% sensitivity and 77% specificity (PPV 79.8%, NPV 70.2%) in detecting early hemorrhage. With these cutoff values, IVCmax or PR reached a 90% sensitivity, while IVCmin and PR reached 98% specificity.
CONCLUSIONS: IVC ultrasound may be superior to SpHb in predicting blood loss and may be useful in addition to vital signs for its follow-up.
METHODS: In this prospective observational study enrolling blood-donor volunteers (BD) and matched controls, we recorded SpHb, IVC diameters, and vital signs. Changes in variables from baseline were compared between BD and controls using the paired t test and Wilcoxon signed rank test.
RESULTS: We included 118 subjects in the BD group and 95 healthy subjects in the control group. Changes in IVC maximum diameter, IVC minimum diameter, pulse rate, mean arterial pressure, pulse pressure, and shock index, but not in other variables, were significantly different in the BD and the control group (P < 0.05). IVCmax ≥1.1 mm yielded a 74% sensitivity and 77% specificity (PPV 79.8%, NPV 70.2%) in detecting early hemorrhage. With these cutoff values, IVCmax or PR reached a 90% sensitivity, while IVCmin and PR reached 98% specificity.
CONCLUSIONS: IVC ultrasound may be superior to SpHb in predicting blood loss and may be useful in addition to vital signs for its follow-up.