MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/1938640011434503

Медицинская библиотека · Foot & ankle specialist · 2012

Plantar pressure distribution among asymptomatic individuals: a cross-sectional study.

Syed Nafeez, Karvannan H, Maiya Arun G, Binukumar B, Prem V, Chakravarty Raj Devashish

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to establish normative data on pressure distribution under the feet (plantar pressure) in standing using a free-mapping device and to find out the association of arch type to that of the plantar pressures.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was carried out among 628 participants aged between 6 and 81 years with no known foot problems or other ailments such as type 2 diabetes or neuropathy, which are known to have an impact on plantar pressures. Plantar pressure measurements were quantitatively recorded using a baropodometric platform (i-Step).

RESULTS

In both males and females of the specified age-group, metatarsal heads were overloaded in terms of magnitude. Increased overload noted in the static plantar pressure measurement is associated with type of the foot arch and gender. A statistically significant relationship between the pressures of left and right feet, pressures under 2 different areas of foot (forefoot and heel), and the average pressures of both feet was also observed.

CONCLUSION

These data could be used to establish age-based normative plantar pressures in the Indian population and provide a basis to assess feet with planus and cavus deformities.

Для цитирования: Syed Nafeez, Karvannan H, Maiya Arun G, Binukumar B, Prem V, Chakravarty Raj Devashish. Plantar pressure distribution among asymptomatic individuals: a cross-sectional study.. Foot & ankle specialist. 2012. DOI: 10.1177/1938640011434503.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.