Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery · 2003
Assessment of facial emotion encoding and decoding skills in children with and without oral clefts.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Slifer Keith J, Diver Tanya, Amari Adrianna, Cohn Jeffrey F, Hilley Lisa, Beck Melissa, McDonnell Sharon, Kane Alana
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Investigated the facial emotion decoding and encoding skills and perceived social acceptance in children with and without oral clefts.
PATIENTS: 8-15 year-old children with surgically repaired facial clefts (n=19) and non-cleft controls (n=19).
METHODS: The children viewed photographs of facial emotions expressed by other children and identified the emotion in each photograph. They were videotaped while listening to a series of brief vignettes designed to evoke facial emotions and while posing prototypic facial expressions. They also completed a measure of their perceived social acceptance. Judges, blind to experimental group and targeted emotion, viewed systematically sampled video images, then recorded their subjective judgement of the emotion expressed in each. Trained coders also scored selected images using objective measures of the degree to which specific facial movements associated with emotion-specified expressions were present.
RESULTS: Analysis of variance procedures detected significantly different patterns of facial responses between the oral cleft and control groups, and within group. Pearson correlation analyses found significant relationships between specific facial movements and perceived social acceptance.
CONCLUSION: Systematic assessment of facial expression in children with oral clefts can identify unique differences in their encoding of facial emotion and may lead to behavioural interventions to improve social functioning by training facial expression skills.
PATIENTS: 8-15 year-old children with surgically repaired facial clefts (n=19) and non-cleft controls (n=19).
METHODS: The children viewed photographs of facial emotions expressed by other children and identified the emotion in each photograph. They were videotaped while listening to a series of brief vignettes designed to evoke facial emotions and while posing prototypic facial expressions. They also completed a measure of their perceived social acceptance. Judges, blind to experimental group and targeted emotion, viewed systematically sampled video images, then recorded their subjective judgement of the emotion expressed in each. Trained coders also scored selected images using objective measures of the degree to which specific facial movements associated with emotion-specified expressions were present.
RESULTS: Analysis of variance procedures detected significantly different patterns of facial responses between the oral cleft and control groups, and within group. Pearson correlation analyses found significant relationships between specific facial movements and perceived social acceptance.
CONCLUSION: Systematic assessment of facial expression in children with oral clefts can identify unique differences in their encoding of facial emotion and may lead to behavioural interventions to improve social functioning by training facial expression skills.