MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jcin.2025.11.029

Медицинская библиотека · JACC. Cardiovascular interventions · 2026

Genotype-Guided vs Conventional Oral P2Y12 Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Combined Analysis of TAILOR-PCI and POPular Genetics.

Galli Mattia, Pereira Naveen L, Lennon Ryan J, van den Broek Wout W A, Claassens Daniel M F, Bergmeijer Thomas O, Rosenberg Yves, Fazzini Luca, Deneer Vera H M, Murad M Hassan, Farkouh Michael E, Rihal Charanjit, Ten Berg Jurrien, Angiolillo Dominick J

СтатьяМетаанализПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Genotype-guided P2Y12 inhibitor selection may improve outcomes in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) patients.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess the impact of guided therapy escalation or de-escalation vs conventional therapy.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials comparing guided therapy using CYP2C19 genetic testing vs conventional therapy among patients with ACS undergoing PCI were searched and individual participant-level data obtained. The primary safety endpoint was time-to-first type 2, 3, or 5 Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) bleeding at 12 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was time-to-first major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) at 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 6,734 participants from 2 randomized controlled trials were available for analysis. After 1 year, there were no differences in the primary safety or efficacy endpoints with overall guided therapy vs conventional therapy. However, guided therapy reduced myocardial infarction (0.68; 95% CI: 0.48-0.97) and net adverse cardiovascular events (NACE) (0.85; 95% CI: 0.73-1.00) compared with conventional therapy. Guided therapy de-escalation reduced the primary safety endpoint (0.77; 95% CI: 0.62-0.97) and NACE (0.77; 95% CI: 0.62-0.94) with no significant difference in MACE, compared with conventional therapy. The primary safety and efficacy endpoints were similar between patients undergoing guided therapy escalation and conventional therapy groups. Time-dependent covariate analyses showed that overall guided therapy and de-escalation strategies reduced bleeding and NACE before 90 days, compared with conventional therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support evaluating genotype-guided therapy by separately analyzing de-escalation and escalation. In ACS patients undergoing PCI, genotype-guided de-escalation reduces bleeding and NACE without increasing MACE, with the greatest benefit in the first 3 months post-PCI. (Genotype-Guided versus Conventional Oral P2Y12 Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials; PROSPERO CRD42024580431).

Для цитирования: Galli Mattia, Pereira Naveen L, Lennon Ryan J, van den Broek Wout W A, Claassens Daniel M F, Bergmeijer Thomas O, Rosenberg Yves, Fazzini Luca, Deneer Vera H M, Murad M Hassan, Farkouh Michael E, Rihal Charanjit, Ten Berg Jurrien, Angiolillo Dominick J. Genotype-Guided vs Conventional Oral P2Y12 Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Combined Analysis of TAILOR-PCI and POPular Genetics.. JACC. Cardiovascular interventions. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2025.11.029.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.